From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pawel@osciak.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
kyungmin.park@samsung.com, sumit.semwal@linaro.org,
robdclark@gmail.com, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, labbott@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC RESEND 03/11] vb2: Move cache synchronisation from buffer done to dqbuf handler
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:25:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F30085.504@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441972234-8643-4-git-send-email-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
On 09/11/2015 01:50 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> The cache synchronisation may be a time consuming operation and thus not
> best performed in an interrupt which is a typical context for
> vb2_buffer_done() calls. This may consume up to tens of ms on some
> machines, depending on the buffer size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> index 64fce4d..c5c0707a 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> @@ -1177,7 +1177,6 @@ void vb2_buffer_done(struct vb2_buffer *vb, enum vb2_buffer_state state)
> {
> struct vb2_queue *q = vb->vb2_queue;
> unsigned long flags;
> - unsigned int plane;
>
> if (WARN_ON(vb->state != VB2_BUF_STATE_ACTIVE))
> return;
> @@ -1197,10 +1196,6 @@ void vb2_buffer_done(struct vb2_buffer *vb, enum vb2_buffer_state state)
> dprintk(4, "done processing on buffer %d, state: %d\n",
> vb->v4l2_buf.index, state);
>
> - /* sync buffers */
> - for (plane = 0; plane < vb->num_planes; ++plane)
> - call_void_memop(vb, finish, vb->planes[plane].mem_priv);
> -
Ah, OK, so it is removed here,
> /* Add the buffer to the done buffers list */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&q->done_lock, flags);
> vb->state = state;
> @@ -2086,7 +2081,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vb2_wait_for_all_buffers);
> static void __vb2_dqbuf(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
> {
> struct vb2_queue *q = vb->vb2_queue;
> - unsigned int i;
> + unsigned int plane;
>
> /* nothing to do if the buffer is already dequeued */
> if (vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_DEQUEUED)
> @@ -2094,13 +2089,18 @@ static void __vb2_dqbuf(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
>
> vb->state = VB2_BUF_STATE_DEQUEUED;
>
> + /* sync buffers */
> + for (plane = 0; plane < vb->num_planes; plane++)
> + call_void_memop(vb, finish, vb->planes[plane].mem_priv);
> +
to here.
I'm not sure if this is correct... So __vb2_dqbuf is called from __vb2_queue_cancel(),
but now the buf_finish() callback is called *before* the memop finish() callback,
where this was the other way around in __vb2_queue_cancel(). I don't think that is
right since buf_finish() expects that the buffer is synced for the cpu.
Was this tested with CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV_DEBUG set and with 'v4l2-compliance -s'?
Not that that would help if things are done in the wrong order...
Regards,
Hans
> /* unmap DMABUF buffer */
> if (q->memory == V4L2_MEMORY_DMABUF)
> - for (i = 0; i < vb->num_planes; ++i) {
> - if (!vb->planes[i].dbuf_mapped)
> + for (plane = 0; plane < vb->num_planes; ++plane) {
> + if (!vb->planes[plane].dbuf_mapped)
> continue;
> - call_void_memop(vb, unmap_dmabuf, vb->planes[i].mem_priv);
> - vb->planes[i].dbuf_mapped = 0;
> + call_void_memop(vb, unmap_dmabuf,
> + vb->planes[plane].mem_priv);
> + vb->planes[plane].dbuf_mapped = 0;
> }
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-11 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-11 11:50 [RFC RESEND 00/11] vb2: Handle user cache hints, allow drivers to choose cache coherency Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 01/11] vb2: Rename confusingly named internal buffer preparation functions Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 15:57 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-15 15:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 02/11] vb2: Move buffer cache synchronisation to prepare from queue Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 16:11 ` Hans Verkuil
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 03/11] vb2: Move cache synchronisation from buffer done to dqbuf handler Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 16:25 ` Hans Verkuil [this message]
2015-09-15 7:51 ` Sakari Ailus
2016-12-15 23:47 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 04/11] v4l: Unify cache management hint buffer flags Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 16:26 ` Hans Verkuil
2015-09-11 16:44 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-15 20:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-17 0:35 ` Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 05/11] v4l2-core: Don't sync cache for a buffer if so requested Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 17:12 ` Hans Verkuil
2015-09-15 8:22 ` Sakari Ailus
2015-09-15 9:06 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-15 20:37 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-17 0:36 ` Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 06/11] vb2: Improve struct vb2_mem_ops documentation; alloc and put are for MMAP Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 17:13 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-15 20:50 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 07/11] vb2: dma-contig: Remove redundant sgt_base field Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 17:28 ` Hans Verkuil
2015-09-15 8:26 ` Sakari Ailus
2016-12-15 21:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-17 0:40 ` Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 08/11] vb2: dma-contig: Move vb2_dc_get_base_sgt() up Sakari Ailus
2016-12-15 21:12 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 09/11] vb2: dma-contig: Don't warn on failure in obtaining scatterlist Sakari Ailus
2016-12-15 21:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 10/11] vb2: dma-contig: Let drivers decide DMA attrs of MMAP and USERPTR bufs Sakari Ailus
2016-12-15 21:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 11/11] vb2: dma-contig: Add WARN_ON_ONCE() to check for potential bugs Sakari Ailus
2016-12-15 21:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-17 0:50 ` Sakari Ailus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F30085.504@xs4all.nl \
--to=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=pawel@osciak.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).