linux-media.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pawel@osciak.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
	kyungmin.park@samsung.com, sumit.semwal@linaro.org,
	robdclark@gmail.com, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, labbott@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC RESEND 03/11] vb2: Move cache synchronisation from buffer done to dqbuf handler
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:25:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F30085.504@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441972234-8643-4-git-send-email-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>

On 09/11/2015 01:50 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> The cache synchronisation may be a time consuming operation and thus not
> best performed in an interrupt which is a typical context for
> vb2_buffer_done() calls. This may consume up to tens of ms on some
> machines, depending on the buffer size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> index 64fce4d..c5c0707a 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> @@ -1177,7 +1177,6 @@ void vb2_buffer_done(struct vb2_buffer *vb, enum vb2_buffer_state state)
>  {
>  	struct vb2_queue *q = vb->vb2_queue;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> -	unsigned int plane;
>  
>  	if (WARN_ON(vb->state != VB2_BUF_STATE_ACTIVE))
>  		return;
> @@ -1197,10 +1196,6 @@ void vb2_buffer_done(struct vb2_buffer *vb, enum vb2_buffer_state state)
>  	dprintk(4, "done processing on buffer %d, state: %d\n",
>  			vb->v4l2_buf.index, state);
>  
> -	/* sync buffers */
> -	for (plane = 0; plane < vb->num_planes; ++plane)
> -		call_void_memop(vb, finish, vb->planes[plane].mem_priv);
> -

Ah, OK, so it is removed here,

>  	/* Add the buffer to the done buffers list */
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&q->done_lock, flags);
>  	vb->state = state;
> @@ -2086,7 +2081,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vb2_wait_for_all_buffers);
>  static void __vb2_dqbuf(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
>  {
>  	struct vb2_queue *q = vb->vb2_queue;
> -	unsigned int i;
> +	unsigned int plane;
>  
>  	/* nothing to do if the buffer is already dequeued */
>  	if (vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_DEQUEUED)
> @@ -2094,13 +2089,18 @@ static void __vb2_dqbuf(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
>  
>  	vb->state = VB2_BUF_STATE_DEQUEUED;
>  
> +	/* sync buffers */
> +	for (plane = 0; plane < vb->num_planes; plane++)
> +		call_void_memop(vb, finish, vb->planes[plane].mem_priv);
> +

to here.

I'm not sure if this is correct... So __vb2_dqbuf is called from __vb2_queue_cancel(),
but now the buf_finish() callback is called *before* the memop finish() callback,
where this was the other way around in __vb2_queue_cancel(). I don't think that is
right since buf_finish() expects that the buffer is synced for the cpu.

Was this tested with CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV_DEBUG set and with 'v4l2-compliance -s'?
Not that that would help if things are done in the wrong order...

Regards,

	Hans

>  	/* unmap DMABUF buffer */
>  	if (q->memory == V4L2_MEMORY_DMABUF)
> -		for (i = 0; i < vb->num_planes; ++i) {
> -			if (!vb->planes[i].dbuf_mapped)
> +		for (plane = 0; plane < vb->num_planes; ++plane) {
> +			if (!vb->planes[plane].dbuf_mapped)
>  				continue;
> -			call_void_memop(vb, unmap_dmabuf, vb->planes[i].mem_priv);
> -			vb->planes[i].dbuf_mapped = 0;
> +			call_void_memop(vb, unmap_dmabuf,
> +					vb->planes[plane].mem_priv);
> +			vb->planes[plane].dbuf_mapped = 0;
>  		}
>  }
>  
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-11 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-11 11:50 [RFC RESEND 00/11] vb2: Handle user cache hints, allow drivers to choose cache coherency Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 01/11] vb2: Rename confusingly named internal buffer preparation functions Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 15:57   ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-15 15:40   ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 02/11] vb2: Move buffer cache synchronisation to prepare from queue Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 16:11   ` Hans Verkuil
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 03/11] vb2: Move cache synchronisation from buffer done to dqbuf handler Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 16:25   ` Hans Verkuil [this message]
2015-09-15  7:51     ` Sakari Ailus
2016-12-15 23:47       ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 04/11] v4l: Unify cache management hint buffer flags Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 16:26   ` Hans Verkuil
2015-09-11 16:44     ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-15 20:15   ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-17  0:35     ` Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 05/11] v4l2-core: Don't sync cache for a buffer if so requested Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 17:12   ` Hans Verkuil
2015-09-15  8:22     ` Sakari Ailus
2015-09-15  9:06       ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-15 20:37   ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-17  0:36     ` Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 06/11] vb2: Improve struct vb2_mem_ops documentation; alloc and put are for MMAP Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 17:13   ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-15 20:50   ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 07/11] vb2: dma-contig: Remove redundant sgt_base field Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 17:28   ` Hans Verkuil
2015-09-15  8:26     ` Sakari Ailus
2016-12-15 21:08   ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-17  0:40     ` Sakari Ailus
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 08/11] vb2: dma-contig: Move vb2_dc_get_base_sgt() up Sakari Ailus
2016-12-15 21:12   ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 09/11] vb2: dma-contig: Don't warn on failure in obtaining scatterlist Sakari Ailus
2016-12-15 21:13   ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 10/11] vb2: dma-contig: Let drivers decide DMA attrs of MMAP and USERPTR bufs Sakari Ailus
2016-12-15 21:40   ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-09-11 11:50 ` [RFC RESEND 11/11] vb2: dma-contig: Add WARN_ON_ONCE() to check for potential bugs Sakari Ailus
2016-12-15 21:57   ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-17  0:50     ` Sakari Ailus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55F30085.504@xs4all.nl \
    --to=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=pawel@osciak.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).