From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:56551 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751288AbbL1PDW (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Dec 2015 10:03:22 -0500 Subject: Re: [media] m88rs6000t: Better exception handling in five functions To: Julia Lawall References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <5680FDB3.7060305@users.sourceforge.net> <56810F56.4080306@users.sourceforge.net> <568148FD.7080209@users.sourceforge.net> <5681497E.7030702@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <56814F35.5030103@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 16:03:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >> Move the jump label directly before the desired log statement >> so that the variable "ret" will not be checked once more >> after a function call. > > This commit message fits with the previous change. Do you prefer an other wording? > It could be nice to put a blank line before the error handling code. Is it really a coding style requirement to insert another blank line between the suggested placement of the statement "return 0;" and the jump label? Regards, Markus