From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:39489 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753940AbcBWSeH (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:34:07 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [media] tvp5150: remove signal generator as input from the DT binding To: Laurent Pinchart References: <1456243798-12453-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <63317542.65NzPYJCcU@avalon> <56CCA3B4.7060700@osg.samsung.com> <4247934.WAaViM8cSf@avalon> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org From: Javier Martinez Canillas Message-ID: <56CCA613.2000309@osg.samsung.com> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:33:55 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4247934.WAaViM8cSf@avalon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Laurent, On 02/23/2016 03:28 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Javier, [snip] >>> >>> Shouldn't we revert the patch that introduced connectors support in the DT >>> bindings in the meantime then, to avoid known to be broken bindings from >>> hitting mainline in case we can't fix them in time for v4.6 ? >> >> Yes, that would be a good idea. I've seen recently though a DT binding doc >> that was marked as unstable / work in progress and I wonder if that's a new >> accepted convention for DT binding docs or is just something that slipped >> through review. > > I'm not sure if it's an established practice but I certainly like it. However, > in this specific case, we know that the bindings are broken, so I think a > revert would be better. > Ok, I'll post a revert then that supersedes this patch. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America