From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.25]:47263 "EHLO lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754951AbcCNHVv (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 03:21:51 -0400 Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH v5 0/8] Add MT8173 Video Encoder Driver and VPU Driver To: tiffany lin , Hans Verkuil , daniel.thompson@linaro.org, Rob Herring , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Matthias Brugger References: <1457939579.32502.10.camel@mtksdaap41> Cc: Daniel Kurtz , Pawel Osciak , Eddie Huang , Yingjoe Chen , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, PoChun.Lin@mediatek.com From: Hans Verkuil Message-ID: <56E66672.9030307@xs4all.nl> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:21:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1457939579.32502.10.camel@mtksdaap41> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/14/2016 08:12 AM, tiffany lin wrote: > Hi Hans, > > After change to use "v4l-utils.git master branch", "V4l2-compliance > -d /dev/video1" fail on "fail: v4l2-test-buffers.cpp(555): > check_0(crbufs.reserved, sizeof(crbufs.reserved))". > > Check the source code and found > > memset(&crbufs, 0xff, sizeof(crbufs)); -> crbufs to 0xff > node->g_fmt(crbufs.format, i); > crbufs.count = 0; > crbufs.memory = m; > fail_on_test(doioctl(node, VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS, &crbufs)); > fail_on_test(check_0(crbufs.reserved, sizeof(crbufs.reserved))); > fail_on_test(crbufs.index != q.g_buffers()); > > crbufs is initialized to fill with 0xff and after VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS, > crbufs.reserved field should be 0x0. But v4l2_m2m_create_bufs and > vb2_create_bufs do not process reserved filed. > Do we really need to check reserved filed filled with 0x0? Or we need to > change vb2_create_bufs to fix this issue? The reserved field is zeroed in v4l_create_bufs() in v4l2-ioctl.c, so even before vb2_create_bufs et al is called. The fact that it is no longer zeroed afterwards suggests that someone is messing with the reserved field. You'll have to do a bit more digging, I'm afraid. Regards, Hans