Re: [PATCH] media: rc: reduce size of struct ir_raw_event

[Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>]

Am 17.03.2016 um 11:53 schrieb Sean Young:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 07:40:59AM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Am 16.03.2016 um 23:28 schrieb Sean Young:
>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:18:38PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>>> +	u8		pulse:1;
>>>> +	u8		reset:1;
>>>> +	u8		timeout:1;
>>>> +	u8		carrier_report:1;
>>>
>>> Why are you changing the type of the bitfields? 
>>>
>> I did this to make sure that the compiler uses one byte for
>> the bit field. When testing gcc also used just one byte when
>> keeping the original "unsigned" type for the bit field members.
>> Therefore it wouldn't be strictly neeeded.
>>
>> But I'm not sure whether it's guaranteed that the compiler packs a
>> bit field to the smallest possible data type and we can rely on it.
>> AFAIK C99 is a little more specific about this implementation detail of
>> bit fields but C89/C90 is used for kernel compilation.
> 
> It might be worth reading about structure packing rules rather than
> guessing.
> 
Whenever it became interesting when reading the statement was:
unspecified / implementation-dependent.
But at least C90 clearly states that only signed / unsigned int are
acceptable for bit fields. Therefore leave the bit field as it is.
I will provide a v2.

Heiner
> 
> Sean
>