From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:27069 "EHLO mga02.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753748AbcC2RUq (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-media@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:20:46 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: Update docs for SYNC ioctl
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
References: <CAO_48GGT48RZaLjg9C+51JyPKzYkkDCFCTrMgfUB+PxQyV8d+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <1458546705-3564-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
 <CANq1E4S0skXbWBOv2bgVddLmZXZE6B7es=+NHKDuJehggnzSvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160321171405.GP28483@phenom.ffwll.local>
 <CANq1E4S4_vmCcPZJwpHkfOYuDe3boHCsYGW8q0U4=+tLui+QYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160323115659.GF21717@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
 <CANq1E4SFPMoE4G4XARFLyEH40OOZnR2v_PQD4=ps3KBvVXUHpA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160323154223.GJ21717@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
 <56F98915.1030200@intel.com>
 <CANq1E4Q-aXTx5YGh0yOiU8cRh_opqrUrGin7qn-9N_EszjXfvA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	=?UTF-8?Q?St=c3=a9phane_Marchesin?= <marcheu@chromium.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
From: Tiago Vignatti <tiago.vignatti@intel.com>
Message-ID: <56FAB954.2060408@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:20:20 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CANq1E4Q-aXTx5YGh0yOiU8cRh_opqrUrGin7qn-9N_EszjXfvA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-media.vger.kernel.org>

On 03/29/2016 06:47 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Tiago Vignatti
> <tiago.vignatti@intel.com> wrote:
>> Do we have an agreement here after all? David? I need to know whether this
>> fixup is okay to go cause I'll need to submit to Chrome OS then.
>
> Sure it is fine. The code is already there, we cannot change it.

ah true. Only now that I've noticed it's already in Linus tree. Thanks 
anyway!

Tiago