From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mailout4.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.14]:62863 "EHLO mailout4.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753389AbcGLMTP (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:19:15 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/44] dma-mapping: Use unsigned long for dma_attrs To: Andrew Morton , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-metag@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-cris-kernel@axis.com, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org References: <1467275019-30789-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <20160712121625.GP23520@phenom.ffwll.local> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Message-id: <5784E03B.6060000@samsung.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:19:07 +0200 MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <20160712121625.GP23520@phenom.ffwll.local> Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/12/2016 02:16 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:23:39AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> This is fifth approach for replacing struct dma_attrs with unsigned >> long. >> >> The main patch (1/44) doing the change is split into many subpatches >> for easier review (2-42). They should be squashed together when >> applying. > > For all the drm driver patches: > > Acked-by: Daniel Vetter > > Should I pull these in through drm-misc, or do you prefer to merge them > through a special topic branch (with everything else) instead on your own? > -Daniel Thanks. I saw today that Andrew Morton applied the patchset so I think he will handle it. Best regards, Krzysztof