Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] media: dt-bindings: Add CAMSS device for Kaanapali

Vijay Kumar Tumati
2025-12-20T16:04:56Z

On 12/16/2025 7:29 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 17/12/2025 00:46, Vijay Kumar Tumati wrote:
>>> I don't understand a reason why to do worse for the upstream, when
>>> there is
>>> a clear and feasible alternative not to do worse, thus my
>>> misunderstanding
>>> and my grief for upstream CAMSS are my concerns.
>>>
>> Thanks for the comments, Vladimir. Bryan's and Krzysztof's argument
>> was that the bindings are required to describe the full hardware
>> regardless of the driver support and either way not modifiable in the
>> future, so they preferred having the HW properties of the key
>> functional blocks in the bindings. And we were specifically asked to
>> add the properties into this node in this patch series. Having said
>> that, my knowledge on how the bindings are handled upstream in the
>> long run as the requirements evolve, is limited. So I will look for
>> some expert advise from Bryan here as he strongly advised for these.
>> Thanks again.
>
> I see no technical reason why describing the whole hardware block
> precludes any further work. How could it ?
>
> Anyway, I'll repeat my ask to describe:
>
> - The full register set
> - The interconnects
> - The clocks and resets
> - The SIDs
>
> ---
> bod

Yes, it is what's been done. Assuming this thread is closed then.

Thanks,

Vijay.