public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>,
	Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau: Remove surplus if-branch
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:15:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7603cbad-2fed-47cc-91f1-81d6f529afb8@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250410092418.135258-4-phasta@kernel.org>

Am 10.04.25 um 11:24 schrieb Philipp Stanner:
> nouveau_fence_done() contains an if-branch which checks for the
> existence of either of two fence backend ops. Those two are the only
> backend ops existing in Nouveau, however; and at least one backend ops
> must be in use for the entire driver to be able to work. The if branch
> is, therefore, surplus.
>
> Remove the if-branch.

What happens here is that nouveau checks if the fence comes from itself or some external source.

So when you remove that check you potentially illegally uses nouveau_fctx() on a non-nouveau fence.

Regards,
Christian.

>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
> index 33535987d8ed..db6f4494405c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
> @@ -259,21 +259,19 @@ nouveau_fence_emit(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
>  bool
>  nouveau_fence_done(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
>  {
> -	if (fence->base.ops == &nouveau_fence_ops_legacy ||
> -	    fence->base.ops == &nouveau_fence_ops_uevent) {
> -		struct nouveau_fence_chan *fctx = nouveau_fctx(fence);
> -		struct nouveau_channel *chan;
> -		unsigned long flags;
> +	struct nouveau_fence_chan *fctx = nouveau_fctx(fence);
> +	struct nouveau_channel *chan;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -		if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->base.flags))
> -			return true;
> +	if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->base.flags))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&fctx->lock, flags);
> +	chan = rcu_dereference_protected(fence->channel, lockdep_is_held(&fctx->lock));
> +	if (chan && nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx))
> +		nvif_event_block(&fctx->event);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fctx->lock, flags);
>  
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&fctx->lock, flags);
> -		chan = rcu_dereference_protected(fence->channel, lockdep_is_held(&fctx->lock));
> -		if (chan && nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx))
> -			nvif_event_block(&fctx->event);
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fctx->lock, flags);
> -	}
>  	return test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->base.flags);
>  }
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-10 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-10  9:24 [PATCH 0/3] drm/nouveau: Fix & improve nouveau_fence_done() Philipp Stanner
2025-04-10  9:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/nouveau: Prevent signaled fences in pending list Philipp Stanner
2025-04-10 12:13   ` Christian König
2025-04-10 12:21     ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-10 12:42       ` Christian König
2025-04-10 12:58   ` Christian König
2025-04-10 13:09     ` Philipp Stanner
2025-04-10 13:16       ` Christian König
2025-04-10 15:36         ` Philipp Stanner
2025-04-11  9:29           ` Philipp Stanner
     [not found]             ` <81a70ba6-94b1-4bb3-a0b2-9e8890f90b33@amd.com>
2025-04-11 12:44               ` Philipp Stanner
2025-04-11 13:06                 ` Christian König
2025-04-11 14:10                   ` Philipp Stanner
2025-04-14  8:54                     ` Philipp Stanner
2025-04-14 14:27                       ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-15  9:56                         ` Christian König
2025-04-15 12:54                           ` Philipp Stanner
2025-04-10  9:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau: Remove surplus if-branch Philipp Stanner
2025-04-10 12:15   ` Christian König [this message]
2025-04-10  9:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/nouveau: Add helper to check base fence Philipp Stanner
2025-04-10  9:51 ` [PATCH 0/3] drm/nouveau: Fix & improve nouveau_fence_done() Philipp Stanner
2025-04-10 12:18   ` Christian König
2025-04-10 13:18     ` Philipp Stanner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7603cbad-2fed-47cc-91f1-81d6f529afb8@amd.com \
    --to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=phasta@kernel.org \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox