* DVICO Fusion Dual Express
2009-07-06 8:42 [linux-dvb] Status of em28xx support Mike Martin
@ 2009-07-06 10:21 ` Collier Family
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Collier Family @ 2009-07-06 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-media
I have a Dvico Fusion Dual Express. It is unfortunately rev 4 and the
firmware is not correct.
lspci -vv -nn
04:00.0 0400: 14f1:8852 (rev 04)
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
Step
ping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
<TAbort-
<MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 193
Region 0: Memory at 57200000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=2M]
Capabilities: [40] Express Endpoint IRQ 0
Device: Supported: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0,
ExtTag-
Device: Latency L0s <64ns, L1 <1us
Device: AtnBtn- AtnInd- PwrInd-
Device: Errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
Device: RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
Device: MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
Link: Supported Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1, Port 0
Link: Latency L0s <2us, L1 <4us
Link: ASPM Disabled RCB 64 bytes CommClk+ ExtSynch-
Link: Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x1
Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA
PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot
+,D3cold-)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [90] Vital Product Data
Capabilities: [a0] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0
Enable
-
Address: 0000000000000000 Data: 0000
the system recognises it 2.6.18-128.1.10.el5 using
video4linux-20090415-88.0.4.el5.x86_64 from atrpms
I'm getting the following from firmware load
Jul 6 20:18:41 localhost kernel: xc2028 1-0061: Loading firmware for
type=BASE F8MHZ (3), id 0000000000000000.
Jul 6 20:18:42 localhost kernel: xc2028 1-0061: Loading firmware for
type=D2633 DTV7 (90), id 0000000000000000.
Jul 6 20:18:42 localhost kernel: xc2028 1-0061: Loading SCODE for type=DTV6
QAM DTV7 DTV78 DTV8 ZARLINK456 SCODE HAS_IF_4760 (620003e0), id
0000000000000000.
Jul 6 20:18:42 localhost kernel: xc2028 1-0061: Incorrect readback of
firmware version.
I suspect rev 4 uses different firmware.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Stephen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: DVICO Fusion Dual Express
@ 2009-07-06 17:04 sonofzev
2009-07-06 21:52 ` Collier Family
2009-07-08 10:26 ` Collier Family
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sonofzev @ 2009-07-06 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-media, 'Collier Family'
Hi there
I get this error message on some of my motherboards but not all, only when
another tuner is in the machine..
I think this was IRQ sharing related. When I have it on a newer board with more
interrupts it seems to work fine
On Mon Jul 6 20:21 , "Collier Family" sent:
>I have a Dvico Fusion Dual Express. It is unfortunately rev 4 and the
>firmware is not correct.
>
>lspci -vv -nn
>
>04:00.0 0400: 14f1:8852 (rev 04)
> Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
>Step
>ping- SERR- FastB2B-
> Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
>
>SERR-
> Latency: 0
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 193
> Region 0: Memory at 57200000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=2M]
> Capabilities: [40] Express Endpoint IRQ 0
> Device: Supported: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0,
>ExtTag-
> Device: Latency L0s
> Device: AtnBtn- AtnInd- PwrInd-
> Device: Errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
> Device: RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
> Device: MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
> Link: Supported Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1, Port 0
> Link: Latency L0s
> Link: ASPM Disabled RCB 64 bytes CommClk+ ExtSynch-
> Link: Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x1
> Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
> Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA
>PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot
>+,D3cold-)
> Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
> Capabilities: [90] Vital Product Data
> Capabilities: [a0] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0
>Enable
>-
> Address: 0000000000000000 Data: 0000
>
>the system recognises it 2.6.18-128.1.10.el5 using
>video4linux-20090415-88.0.4.el5.x86_64 from atrpms
>
>I'm getting the following from firmware load
>
>Jul 6 20:18:41 localhost kernel: xc2028 1-0061: Loading firmware for
>type=BASE F8MHZ (3), id 0000000000000000.
>Jul 6 20:18:42 localhost kernel: xc2028 1-0061: Loading firmware for
>type=D2633 DTV7 (90), id 0000000000000000.
>Jul 6 20:18:42 localhost kernel: xc2028 1-0061: Loading SCODE for type=DTV6
>QAM DTV7 DTV78 DTV8 ZARLINK456 SCODE HAS_IF_4760 (620003e0), id
>0000000000000000.
>Jul 6 20:18:42 localhost kernel: xc2028 1-0061: Incorrect readback of
>firmware version.
>
>I suspect rev 4 uses different firmware.
>
>Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>Stephen
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: DVICO Fusion Dual Express
2009-07-06 17:04 DVICO Fusion Dual Express sonofzev
@ 2009-07-06 21:52 ` Collier Family
2009-07-08 10:26 ` Collier Family
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Collier Family @ 2009-07-06 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sonofzev, linux-media
Thanks for the reply
After I sent the original message I pulled latest hg and installed.
It worked after that.
I suspect some relevent changes since Axel's last video4linux rpm.
Stephen
----- Original Message -----
From: <sonofzev@iinet.net.au>
To: <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>; "'Collier Family'"
<judithc@bigpond.net.au>
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 3:04 AM
Subject: Re: DVICO Fusion Dual Express
Hi there
I get this error message on some of my motherboards but not all, only when
another tuner is in the machine..
I think this was IRQ sharing related. When I have it on a newer board with
more
interrupts it seems to work fine
On Mon Jul 6 20:21 , "Collier Family" sent:
>I have a Dvico Fusion Dual Express. It is unfortunately rev 4 and the
>firmware is not correct.
>
>lspci -vv -nn
>
>04:00.0 0400: 14f1:8852 (rev 04)
> Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
>Step
>ping- SERR- FastB2B-
> Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
>
>SERR-
> Latency: 0
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 193
> Region 0: Memory at 57200000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=2M]
> Capabilities: [40] Express Endpoint IRQ 0
> Device: Supported: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0,
>ExtTag-
> Device: Latency L0s
> Device: AtnBtn- AtnInd- PwrInd-
> Device: Errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
> Device: RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
> Device: MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
> Link: Supported Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1, Port
> 0
> Link: Latency L0s
> Link: ASPM Disabled RCB 64 bytes CommClk+ ExtSynch-
> Link: Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x1
> Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
> Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA
>PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot
>+,D3cold-)
> Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
> Capabilities: [90] Vital Product Data
> Capabilities: [a0] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0
>Enable
>-
> Address: 0000000000000000 Data: 0000
>
>the system recognises it 2.6.18-128.1.10.el5 using
>video4linux-20090415-88.0.4.el5.x86_64 from atrpms
>
>I'm getting the following from firmware load
>
>Jul 6 20:18:41 localhost kernel: xc2028 1-0061: Loading firmware for
>type=BASE F8MHZ (3), id 0000000000000000.
>Jul 6 20:18:42 localhost kernel: xc2028 1-0061: Loading firmware for
>type=D2633 DTV7 (90), id 0000000000000000.
>Jul 6 20:18:42 localhost kernel: xc2028 1-0061: Loading SCODE for
>type=DTV6
>QAM DTV7 DTV78 DTV8 ZARLINK456 SCODE HAS_IF_4760 (620003e0), id
>0000000000000000.
>Jul 6 20:18:42 localhost kernel: xc2028 1-0061: Incorrect readback of
>firmware version.
>
>I suspect rev 4 uses different firmware.
>
>Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>Stephen
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: DVICO Fusion Dual Express
2009-07-06 17:04 DVICO Fusion Dual Express sonofzev
2009-07-06 21:52 ` Collier Family
@ 2009-07-08 10:26 ` Collier Family
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Collier Family @ 2009-07-08 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sonofzev, linux-media
It accepted the firmware OK after the update but still wouldn't tune.
I did some debugging and found the version was the fault.
The code expects version 2 but this card supplies version 4 to the driver.
a quick patch added the lines below to cx23885-core.c at line 724
case 0x04:
/* CX23885-13Z */
dev->hwrevision = 0xb0;
break;
and all worked.
Stephen
----- Original Message -----
From: <sonofzev@iinet.net.au>
To: <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>; "'Collier Family'"
<judithc@bigpond.net.au>
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 3:04 AM
Subject: Re: DVICO Fusion Dual Express
Hi there
I get this error message on some of my motherboards but not all, only when
another tuner is in the machine..
I think this was IRQ sharing related. When I have it on a newer board with
more
interrupts it seems to work fine
On Mon Jul 6 20:21 , "Collier Family" sent:
>I have a Dvico Fusion Dual Express. It is unfortunately rev 4 and the
>firmware is not correct.
>
>lspci -vv -nn
>
>04:00.0 0400: 14f1:8852 (rev 04)
> Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
>Step
>ping- SERR- FastB2B-
> Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
>
>SERR-
> Latency: 0
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 193
> Region 0: Memory at 57200000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=2M]
> Capabilities: [40] Express Endpoint IRQ 0
> Device: Supported: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0,
>ExtTag-
> Device: Latency L0s
> Device: AtnBtn- AtnInd- PwrInd-
> Device: Errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
> Device: RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
> Device: MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
> Link: Supported Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1, Port
> 0
> Link: Latency L0s
> Link: ASPM Disabled RCB 64 bytes CommClk+ ExtSynch-
> Link: Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x1
> Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
> Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA
>PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot
>+,D3cold-)
> Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
> Capabilities: [90] Vital Product Data
> Capabilities: [a0] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0
>Enable
>-
> Address: 0000000000000000 Data: 0000
>
>the system recognises it 2.6.18-128.1.10.el5 using
>video4linux-20090415-88.0.4.el5.x86_64 from atrpms
>
>I'm getting the following from firmware load
>
>Jul 6 20:18:41 localhost kernel: xc2028 1-0061: Loading firmware for
>type=BASE F8MHZ (3), id 0000000000000000.
>Jul 6 20:18:42 localhost kernel: xc2028 1-0061: Loading firmware for
>type=D2633 DTV7 (90), id 0000000000000000.
>Jul 6 20:18:42 localhost kernel: xc2028 1-0061: Loading SCODE for
>type=DTV6
>QAM DTV7 DTV78 DTV8 ZARLINK456 SCODE HAS_IF_4760 (620003e0), id
>0000000000000000.
>Jul 6 20:18:42 localhost kernel: xc2028 1-0061: Incorrect readback of
>firmware version.
>
>I suspect rev 4 uses different firmware.
>
>Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>Stephen
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-08 11:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-06 17:04 DVICO Fusion Dual Express sonofzev
2009-07-06 21:52 ` Collier Family
2009-07-08 10:26 ` Collier Family
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-06 8:42 [linux-dvb] Status of em28xx support Mike Martin
2009-07-06 10:21 ` DVICO Fusion Dual Express Collier Family
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox