From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-174.mta0.migadu.com (out-174.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A280438F239 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 22:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.174 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784069771; cv=none; b=cv93tOG+YcJRm+IzQ4+xZSKvvOe4GR4wnhzafwWdJnRHLuQd1tUiiKgC599xq74R3DAp4h1n5SO+SSjxRUV70vsdHZnxxM7Phbvj6v4g2DnJiL5caJLxZDpGz8rQ2eRiFAEpLV2pLLE5e6aEx4Qrow30bs7dLwKBiKRxtbHWaaI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784069771; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GnUPPQk6UL1Oj/4ugIACqj/MgXR336xmOfR2QkycNp8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KX+iZJYtZfB0jiRDZ5yMFq6UQQUn5eyFdHeEFd1lSIP0IbU1Dz3PzjpLNQUPkFjiYNIisD6X5pHbVFXUqL1hhkxXoe2LetPq4GAEMcwgQW13DF0BcD+Lj09/aIBA9h0e/SD36k+gM76YsuT570u3LXwgWLvRkliYzECpiisIqtI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=vo0vdJY8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="vo0vdJY8" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1784069767; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SrFFAzMQKzs1GuXJc4A0lImb1clhx9pMOg+JWW0xDG0=; b=vo0vdJY8FKzjXCswjmoGATPZcB4BG/OLEac/pyjrf7dQSuJazc9KDgTXSS0hFzlGwDUjwf mokrHNVUDbn720r6tK6Tgh/nzQ/HHqbMQiDxDLY6uVAPNzYPkaQsQPPx0Ma4z6tsF6kl3a oYWYj91iq/qtq49vw8o8od+ib8US+1Q= From: Roman Gushchin To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Derek Barbosa , Matthieu Baerts , Konstantin Ryabitsev , Jason Gunthorpe , Steven Rostedt , users@kernel.org, Linux Media Mailing List , Stephen Finucane Subject: Re: Linking Patchwork with Sashiko? In-Reply-To: <20260713220427.582b28bf@foz.lan> (Mauro Carvalho Chehab's message of "Mon, 13 Jul 2026 22:04:27 +0200") References: <7ia4tsrkn1k4.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> <20260602223936.27def657@foz.lan> <20260604085201.177ad537@foz.lan> <20260607195656.02788791@foz.lan> <20260710074528.5a6e4457@foz.lan> <20260710083845.23c753ca@foz.lan> <87wlv2jq4t.fsf@linux.dev> <20260713095538.3d5e86f1@foz.lan> <20260713094120.GD1127719@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> <20260713220427.582b28bf@foz.lan> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 22:55:42 +0000 Message-ID: <7ia4mrvtrxjl.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 12:41:20 +0300 > Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> > > Individuals can set their >> > > spam filters up if they don't want to get these emails, I can't control >> > > it. Providing individual authors an option "I don't want my patches >> > > to be reviewed" sound strange to me. It's like "I don't want my patches >> > > to be tested by unit tests". >> > >> > I agree with you, and, on my head, not sending e-mails to the author >> > is a clear violation to one of the most basic net etiquette rule on >> > mailing lists: any replies to posts there should reach the author. >> >> I don't know where that one comes from. >> >> What happened to this other "most basic rule" that subscription to >> services that deliver e-mails should be opt-in ? > > Replying to an e-mail is not subscribing to a service. It is the > author's right to know if one replies publicly to his e-mails. > Explicitly removing him from the C/C of such replies is a violation > of his rights. > > On other words, it is implicit that, if you post an e-mail, you'll be > expecting actions or answers to it. > > Now, if one really doesn't really want to receive e-mails from a > particular sender, a block list solves it. Alternatively, a way to > opt-out is welcomed. > > See, this is different than adding someone to a mailing list without > his consent: On such case, people receive e-mails unrelated to their > preferences. For those, opt-in is the right net etiquette. I agree with this. But also just practically: if someone who opted out from sashiko emails posts a patch and sashiko finds say a critical issue, do we expect the maintainer to go and manually check each time whether the author opted out and forward the review? Thanks!