From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>,
Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@intel.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/39] Implement kernel-doc in Python
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 07:33:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8734g214c7.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250225085406.7fa87ee3@foz.lan>
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> writes:
> There's no need to rush things there, provided that people refrain
> touching the Perl version of kernel-doc. So yeah, postponing it to
> the next merge window makes sense to me. Perhaps we should announce
> somewhere that we're in the process of doing such replacement, asking
> people to wait for 6.15-rc before sending any changes to kernel-doc.
I have no problem with sending an announcement ... but I wouldn't worry
about a flood of changes to the Perl script creating more work. There's
not a lot of people willing to dive into that thing in the first
place...
Thanks,
jon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-25 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-24 9:08 [PATCH v2 00/39] Implement kernel-doc in Python Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-02-24 9:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/39] drivers: media: intel-ipu3.h: fix identation on a kernel-doc markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-02-24 23:49 ` [PATCH v2 00/39] Implement kernel-doc in Python Jonathan Corbet
2025-02-25 7:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-02-25 14:33 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8734g214c7.fsf@trenco.lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tian.shu.qiu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox