From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:49860 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753543Ab1CVJxq (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2011 05:53:46 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1yHY-0001Wl-78 for linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:53:44 +0100 Received: from 193.160.199.2 ([193.160.199.2]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:53:44 +0100 Received: from bjorn by 193.160.199.2 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:53:44 +0100 To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= Subject: Re: S2-3200 switching-timeouts on 2.6.38 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:53:29 +0100 Message-ID: <8739mfwkfa.fsf@nemi.mork.no> References: <4D87AB0F.4040908@t-online.de> <20110321131602.36d146b1.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-ID: Sender: Manu Abraham writes: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:46:23 +0100 Rico Tzschichholz wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would like to know if there is any intention to include this patch >>> soon? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/244201/ >> >> There are MANY posted but unmerged patches in patchwork from the linux-media >> mailing list.  What is going on (or not going on) with patch merging? > > Actually, quite a lot of effort was put in to get that part right. It > does the reverse thing that's to be done. > The revamped version is here [1] If the issue persists still, then it > needs to be investigated further. > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxtv-commits@linuxtv.org/msg09214.html So the patch state should be "Rejected" and not "Under Review". Would certainly help us all if the patchwork state was updated whenever a patch actually was processed... Bjørn