From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m9VI4FlH013615 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:04:15 -0400 Received: from smtp7-g19.free.fr (smtp7-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.64]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9VI43e6022518 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:04:03 -0400 To: Guennadi Liakhovetski References: <20081029232544.661b8f17.ospite@studenti.unina.it> <87mygkof3j.fsf@free.fr> From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:04:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Guennadi Liakhovetski's message of "Fri\, 31 Oct 2008 18\:40\:49 +0100 \(CET\)") Message-ID: <874p2sod4e.fsf@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mt9m111: Fix YUYV format for pxa-camera List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Guennadi Liakhovetski writes: > Do I understand it right, that although this wasn't a regression, this is > a bug-fix, right? If so, it should go into 2.6.28. I'll take care of it. Yes, a bug fix, and yes, not a regression, just my silly mind trusting the specifications :) And yes, should go into 2.6.28-rc series IMO, thanks. -- Robert -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list