From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from canardo.mork.no ([148.122.252.1]:60442 "EHLO canardo.mork.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757606Ab0FCIvt convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2010 04:51:49 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= To: Hans de Goede Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 16077] New: Drop is video frame rate in kernel .34 References: <20100602140916.759d7159.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4C072451.7090001@infradead.org> <87r5kod2dm.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <4C076AD5.2090909@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 10:51:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4C076AD5.2090909@redhat.com> (Hans de Goede's message of "Thu, 03 Jun 2010 10:41:57 +0200") Message-ID: <876320cxd9.fsf@nemi.mork.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hans de Goede writes: > I notice in the original bug report that you claim that the lower framerate > clip with 2.6.34 has "much better quality", could you define this a bit better. Sorry for the confusion, but this wasn't me. I just read the bug report. Bjørn