From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mA3MW7GK005635 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2008 17:32:08 -0500 Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (smtp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.30]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mA3MVvVi015720 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2008 17:31:57 -0500 To: Guennadi Liakhovetski References: <20081029232544.661b8f17.ospite@studenti.unina.it> <87mygkof3j.fsf@free.fr> <87skq87mgp.fsf@free.fr> <87mygg4l5l.fsf@free.fr> From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:31:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Guennadi Liakhovetski's message of "Mon\, 3 Nov 2008 23\:26\:43 +0100 \(CET\)") Message-ID: <87k5bk30h0.fsf@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mt9m111: Fix YUYV format for pxa-camera List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Guennadi Liakhovetski writes: > Ok, just thinking one step further - Antonio most certainly was testing > V4L2_PIX_FMT_YUYV, i.e., packed with his application, any other YCbCr > format would be rejected by mt9m111 and YUYV _is_ packed. So, I think this > is indeed the case - there are mo errors in datasheets, we just named the > formats wrongly in pxa-camera and mt9m111 drivers. I don't agree. This has nothing to do with naming, this has to do with byte order on qif bus and out of mt9m111 sensor. But you can change my mind : just tell me where my thinking was wrong in the previous mail where I stated bytes order (out of mt9m111 and in pxa qif bus). -- Robert -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list