From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.4]:45090 "EHLO smtp4-g21.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933189AbZDAShj (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:37:39 -0400 To: Darius Augulis , Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: soc_camera_open() not called References: <49D37485.7030805@gmail.com> <49D3788D.2070406@gmail.com> <87zlf0cl7o.fsf@free.fr> <49D3AE13.9070201@gmail.com> From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:37:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <49D3AE13.9070201@gmail.com> (Darius Augulis's message of "Wed\, 01 Apr 2009 21\:10\:27 +0300") Message-ID: <87r60cmd94.fsf@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Darius Augulis writes: >>> Darius Augulis wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm trying to launch mx1_camera based on new v4l and soc-camera tree. >>>> After loading mx1_camera module, I see that .add callback is not called. >>>> In debug log I see that soc_camera_open() is not called too. >>>> What should call this function? Is this my driver problem? >>>> p.s. loading sensor driver does not change situation. >>>> >> >> Are you by any chance using last 2.6.29 kernel ? >> If so, would [1] be the answer to your question ? >> >> [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/24/625 > thanks. it means we should expect soc-camera fix for this? > I'm using 2.6.29-git8, but seems it's not fixed yet. No, I don't think so. The last time I checked there had to be an amendement to the patch which introduced the driver core regression, as it touches other areas as well (sound/soc and mtd from memory). I think Guennadi can confirm this, as he's the one who raised the issue in the first place. Cheers. -- Robert