From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mBOHb6xG021962 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:37:07 -0500 Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBOHaqcc003990 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:36:52 -0500 To: Guennadi Liakhovetski References: <1228166159-18164-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <87iqpi4qb0.fsf@free.fr> <87wsdplc29.fsf@free.fr> From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 18:36:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87wsdplc29.fsf@free.fr> (Robert Jarzmik's message of "Wed\, 24 Dec 2008 18\:26\:06 +0100") Message-ID: <87r63xlbkc.fsf@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: soc-camera: current stack List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Robert Jarzmik writes: > I made some tests of your patches against mainline tree (2.6.28-rc4 actually), > on pxa271 + mt9m111. > > I'm not sure whether the problem is not on my setup, I hadn't touched it for > days. I know after opening the video device, I setup a camera register before > taking the picture (to set up the test pattern and automate my non-regression > tests). OK, I found. Was on my side, my kernel and my modules were not in sync (the CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV_DEBUG was in modules, not in kernel). So you should know the whole serie is working fine on my setup :))) Cheers. -- Robert -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list