From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
To: Pawel Osciak <pawel@osciak.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: videobuf2-dma-sg and multiple planes semantics
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 19:08:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87twkiupnf.fsf@belgarion.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y49uuu21.fsf@belgarion.home> (Robert Jarzmik's message of "Mon, 07 Mar 2016 17:33:26 +0100")
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've been converting pxa_camera driver from videobuf to videobuf2, and I have a
> question about multiple plane semantics.
>
> I have a case where I have 3 planes for a yuv422 capture :
> - 1 Y plane (total_size / 2 bytes)
> - 1 U plane (total_size / 4 bytes)
> - 1 V plane (total_size / 4 bytes)
>
> I would have expected vb2_dma_sg_plane_desc(vb, i) to return me 3 different
> sg_tables, one for each plane. I would have been then able to feed them to 3
> dmaengine channels (this is the case for pxa27x platform), so that the 3 planes
> are filled in concurrently.
>
> My understanding is that videobuf2-dma-sg has only 1 sg_table, which seems to be
> enforced by vb2_dma_sg_cookie(), so the question is : is it on purpose, and how
> do the multiple planes are handled within videobuf2-dma-sg ?
Oh I think I was a bit mislead, because I was looking at it from a userspace
perspective. The in-kernel pxa_camera has 3 different sg_tables all right.
The issue is rather that from userspace, the call to VIDIOC_QUERYBUF, which is
an old userspace program (such as capture_example.c, year 2008 version), returns
only half of the total_size.
Now looking at it more closely, I think this is because :
- in videobuf2-v4l2.c
- as my old program doesn't set the V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE bit
- __fill_v4l2_buffer() returns b->length = vb->planes[0].length
I would have expected to have b->length = sum(vb->planes[i].length).
Could someone explain to me the rationale behind returning only the first plane
length instead of the sum of all planes lengthes ?
Cheers.
--
Robert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-07 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-07 16:33 videobuf2-dma-sg and multiple planes semantics Robert Jarzmik
2016-03-07 18:08 ` Robert Jarzmik [this message]
2016-03-08 9:39 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-03-08 11:05 ` Robert Jarzmik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87twkiupnf.fsf@belgarion.home \
--to=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=pawel@osciak.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox