From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/14] media: mt9m111: prevent module removal while in use
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 21:31:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vaz3qha6.fsf@belgarion.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4a60c89e-f183-5c92-8c5d-e5d75767c10b@xs4all.nl
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> writes:
> On 08/08/2016 09:30 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> The mt9m111 can be a removable module : the only case where the module
>> should be kept loaded is while it is used, ie. while an active
>> transation is ongoing on it.
>>
>> The notion of active transaction is mapped on the power state of the
>> module : if powered on the removal is prohibited.
>
> I don't really see the purpose of this patch: if this driver is loaded
> by a platform driver (such as pxa_camera), then the module count should be
> 1 and it isn't possible to unload.
>
> So you shouldn't need this patch. Am I missing something?
Well, what you are missing is ugly and twisted.
With the current patchset, pxa_camera doesn't acquire the module (see
pxa_camera_sensor_bound()). That is the ugly part.
The reason behind is that if it acquires it, it's totally impossible to rmmod
either pxa_camera or mt9m111 because of the cross-dependency I wasn't able to
solve up to now.
The dependency chain goes as follows :
- pxa_camera should +1 refcount mt9m111 in pxa_camera_sensor_bound()
- mt9m111 should +1 refcount pxa_camera through the MCLK get_clock()
Without MCLK, mt9m111 is not clocked, and no I2C is available, hence no
control and a total loss of context
The purpose of this patch was the mt9m111 aquired a +1 refcount on pxa_camera so
that pxa_camera is prevented from removal while a transfer is underway, and
while the mt9m111 has the MCLK refcount acquired.
I perfectly know this is suboptimal, but I didn't find a way yet to solve
this. I was thinking to use pxac_fops_camera_open() to refcount +1 mt9m111
module and pxac_fops_camera_release() to refcound -1 mt9m111. But that didn't
work because in order for mt9m111 to probe, the I2C has to be functional, and
therefore the MCLK has to be provided.
> No other driver in drivers/media/i2c does something like this.
Yeah, I would bet either no other driver has the crossed dependency or they can
never be rmmoded.
Let me see how I can drop this patch and still prevent a kernel panic upon an
rmmod of either mt9m111 or pxa_camera.
Cheers.
--
Robert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-14 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-08 19:30 [PATCH v3 00/14] pxa_camera transition to v4l2 standalone device Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-08 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] media: mt9m111: make a standalone v4l2 subdevice Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-08 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] media: mt9m111: prevent module removal while in use Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-13 18:40 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-08-14 19:31 ` Robert Jarzmik [this message]
2016-08-08 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] media: mt9m111: use only the SRGB colorspace Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-08 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] media: mt9m111: move mt9m111 out of soc_camera Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-08 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] media: platform: pxa_camera: convert to vb2 Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-13 9:25 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-13 9:29 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-08-13 11:15 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-08 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] media: platform: pxa_camera: trivial move of functions Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-08 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] media: platform: pxa_camera: introduce sensor_call Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-08 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] media: platform: pxa_camera: make printk consistent Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-08 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] media: platform: pxa_camera: add buffer sequencing Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-15 13:26 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-15 13:31 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-08-15 14:42 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-08 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] media: platform: pxa_camera: remove set_crop Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-13 18:50 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-08-14 19:29 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-08 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] media: platform: pxa_camera: make a standalone v4l2 device Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-13 18:58 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-08-14 19:30 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-08 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] media: platform: pxa_camera: add debug register access Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-13 18:46 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-08-14 19:30 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-08 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] media: platform: pxa_camera: change stop_streaming semantics Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-08 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] media: platform: pxa_camera: move pxa_camera out of soc_camera Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-15 10:04 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-08-08 20:16 ` [PATCH v3 00/14] pxa_camera transition to v4l2 standalone device Hans Verkuil
2016-08-13 19:02 ` Hans Verkuil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vaz3qha6.fsf@belgarion.home \
--to=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=trivial@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox