From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:56962 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751090AbcCDHqz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2016 02:46:55 -0500 From: Jani Nikula To: Russel Winder , Keith Packard , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Jonathan Corbet Cc: LKML , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Vetter , Hans Verkuil , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Graham Whaley Subject: Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit In-Reply-To: <1457076530.13171.13.camel@winder.org.uk> References: <20160213145317.247c63c7@lwn.net> <87y49zr74t.fsf@intel.com> <20160303071305.247e30b1@lwn.net> <20160303155037.705f33dd@recife.lan> <86egbrm9hw.fsf@hiro.keithp.com> <1457076530.13171.13.camel@winder.org.uk> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 09:46:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87vb52r8gn.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Russel Winder wrote: > On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 15:23 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: >>   1) the python version (asciidoc) appears to have been abandoned in >>      favor of the ruby version.  > > This is I think true, however the Java-based tool chain Asciidoctor is > I believe the standard bearer for ASCIIdoc these days, albeit called > ASCIIdoctor. If we're talking about the same asciidoctor (http://asciidoctor.org/) it's written in ruby but you can apparently run it in JVM using JRuby. Calling it Java-based is misleading. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center