From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mBOHQMUQ018053 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:26:22 -0500 Received: from smtp3-g19.free.fr (smtp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.29]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBOHQ8EA031232 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:26:08 -0500 To: Guennadi Liakhovetski References: <1228166159-18164-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <87iqpi4qb0.fsf@free.fr> From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 18:26:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Guennadi Liakhovetski's message of "Sat\, 20 Dec 2008 02\:14\:15 +0100 \(CET\)") Message-ID: <87wsdplc29.fsf@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: soc-camera: current stack List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Guennadi Liakhovetski writes: > This should produce an equivalent of what is currently in my hg tree - at > least in what soc-camera concerns. If there's any interest, I might look > into installing a git-server and providing a git-tree with soc-camera > patches on that server, for 3 users to pull 5 putches every 2 weeks my > 400MHz ARM9 on a dyndns ADSL line should be enough:-) > > Next on queue (not yet in any of the directories on that server) Hi Guennadi, I made some tests of your patches against mainline tree (2.6.28-rc4 actually), on pxa271 + mt9m111. I have one little problem I can't remember having before : [ 728.372987] Backtrace: [ 728.378014] [] (mt9m111_set_register+0x0/0x80 [mt9m111]) from [] (soc_camera_s_register+0x2c/0x38 [soc_camera]) [ 728.388248] r5:039e6cf0 r4:00000018 [ 728.393278] [] (soc_camera_s_register+0x0/0x38 [soc_camera]) from [] (__video_ioctl2+0x684/0x39a4) [ 728.403419] [] (__video_ioctl2+0x0/0x39a4) from [] (video_ioctl2+0x1c/0x20) [ 728.413404] [] (video_ioctl2+0x0/0x20) from [] (vfs_ioctl+0x74/0x78) [ 728.423393] [] (vfs_ioctl+0x0/0x78) from [] (do_vfs_ioctl+0x390/0x4ac) [ 728.433342] r5:039e6cf0 r4:c39d3340 [ 728.438221] [] (do_vfs_ioctl+0x0/0x4ac) from [] (sys_ioctl+0x40/0x68) [ 728.447976] [] (sys_ioctl+0x0/0x68) from [] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x2c) [ 728.457785] r7:00000036 r6:4018564f r5:039e6cf0 r4:00000000 [ 728.462692] Code: e89da800 e1a0c00d e92dd830 e24cb004 (e5913000) [ 728.468135] ---[ end trace a231255d0862dac6 ]--- I'm not sure whether the problem is not on my setup, I hadn't touched it for days. I know after opening the video device, I setup a camera register before taking the picture (to set up the test pattern and automate my non-regression tests). Will check after Christmas :) Cheers. -- Robert -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list