From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: santiago.nunez@ridgerun.com
Cc: "Narnakaje\, Snehaprabha" <nsnehaprabha@ti.com>,
davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com,
todd.fischer@ridgerun.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6 v5] Support for TVP7002 in dm365 board
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:35:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y6mxalep.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE1E903.4030605@ridgerun.com> (Santiago Nunez-Corrales's message of "Fri\, 23 Oct 2009 11\:33\:55 -0600")
Santiago Nunez-Corrales <snunez@ridgerun.com> writes:
> Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> <santiago.nunez@ridgerun.com> writes:
>>
>>
>>> From: Santiago Nunez-Corrales <santiago.nunez@ridgerun.com>
>>>
>>> This patch provides support for TVP7002 in architecture definitions
>>> within DM365.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Santiago Nunez-Corrales <santiago.nunez@ridgerun.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c | 170 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> 1 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c
>>> index a1d5e7d..6c544d3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c
>>> @@ -38,6 +38,11 @@
>>> #include <mach/common.h>
>>> #include <mach/mmc.h>
>>> #include <mach/nand.h>
>>> +#include <mach/gpio.h>
>>> +#include <linux/videodev2.h>
>>> +#include <media/tvp514x.h>
>>> +#include <media/tvp7002.h>
>>> +#include <media/davinci/videohd.h>
>>> static inline int have_imager(void)
>>> @@ -48,8 +53,11 @@ static inline int have_imager(void)
>>> static inline int have_tvp7002(void)
>>> {
>>> - /* REVISIT when it's supported, trigger via Kconfig */
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_VIDEO_TVP7002
>>> + return 1;
>>> +#else
>>> return 0;
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>
>> I've said this before, but I'll say it again. I don't like the
>> #ifdef-on-Kconfig-option here.
>>
>> Can you add a probe hook to the platform_data so that when the tvp7002
>> is found it can call pdata->probe() which could then set a flag
>> for use by have_tvp7002().
>>
>> This will have he same effect without the ifdef since if the driver
>> is not compiled in, its probe can never be triggered.
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
> Kevin,
>
> I've been working on this particular implementation. This
> board-dm365-evm.c is specific to the board, therefore I don't still
> get the point of not having those values wired to the board file, but
> I know it'd be nice to have the CPLD configuration triggered upon
> TVP7002 detection. I see two options:
Having them in the board file is appropriate, what I object to is the
selection by Kconfig. Run-time detection is always preferred when
possible.
> 1. Do the callback function inside pdata and initialize it at driver
> load time (tvp7002_probe). Set tvp5146 as default and override when
> driver loads (and restore when unloads).
This is the preferred option to me.
> 2. Add an entry to sysfs such that it can be user-configurable whether
> to activate one of the other regardless of whether tvp5156 or tvp7002
> are actually there (the only result would be fail to access the
> device).
Why do you need sysfs options for switching? Wouldn't building as
modules and loading/unloading the needed modules serve the same
purpose?
Remeber that the 'probe' isn't going to be called until the platform_driver
is registered, and that will (usually) happen at module load time.
> Sneha, do you have any suggestions on this one?
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-26 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-15 14:43 [PATCH 2/6 v5] Support for TVP7002 in dm365 board santiago.nunez
2009-10-15 18:47 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-10-20 12:29 ` Nori, Sekhar
2009-10-20 16:37 ` Santiago Nunez-Corrales
2009-10-23 17:33 ` Santiago Nunez-Corrales
2009-10-26 21:35 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2009-10-27 15:42 ` Narnakaje, Snehaprabha
2009-10-27 15:53 ` Santiago Nunez-Corrales
2009-10-27 16:09 ` Narnakaje, Snehaprabha
2009-10-27 17:27 ` Santiago Nunez-Corrales
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y6mxalep.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsnehaprabha@ti.com \
--cc=santiago.nunez@ridgerun.com \
--cc=todd.fischer@ridgerun.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox