From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mAPIkuQE003725 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:46:56 -0500 Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (smtp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.30]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAPIk7uL026820 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:46:07 -0500 To: Mike Rapoport References: <1227603594-16953-1-git-send-email-mike@compulab.co.il> From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:46:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1227603594-16953-1-git-send-email-mike@compulab.co.il> (Mike Rapoport's message of "Tue\, 25 Nov 2008 10\:59\:54 +0200") Message-ID: <87y6z7fxue.fsf@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mt9m111: add support for mt9m112 since sensors seem identical List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Mike Rapoport writes: > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport > --- > drivers/media/video/mt9m111.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Yes, only sensor size and version seem different. I presume you have checked that the I2C addresses are the same (0x5d or 0x48), and the datasheets match ? Then, would be please make me a favor : modify the Kconfig and mt9m111 comments to reflect that mt9m112 support is provided, please ? Cheers. -- Robert -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list