From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m85KH2r2008968 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 16:17:03 -0400 Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr (smtp6-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.36]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m85KGo2w007652 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 16:16:51 -0400 To: Guennadi Liakhovetski References: <20080905103917.GQ4941@pengutronix.de> From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:16:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Guennadi Liakhovetski's message of "Fri\, 5 Sep 2008 20\:12\:56 +0200 \(CEST\)") Message-ID: <87zlmm73h3.fsf@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: [soc-camera] about the y_skip_top parameter List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Guennadi Liakhovetski writes: > Hm, AFAIR, the reason was different. I was told, that "all" cameras > corrupt the first line, that's why that parameter has been introduced. I > don't think it was related to PXA270. In any case, why don't you just set > this parameter to whatever you need in your hist driver .add method, for > example, before calling camera's .init? Actually I think there is now one camera at least which doesn't ... the mt9m111 :) Maybe it has to do with the chip internals, which uses these first lines to make its calculation on white balance, gamma auto correction etc ... -- Robert -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list