Re: [PATCH/RFC] tmio_mmc: keep card-detect interrupts enabled

[Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>]

On Sat, 28 Nov 2009, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Ian Molton wrote:
> 
> > Well if they are only masked they shouldnt stop being asserted. But we
> > should unmask them again.
> > 
> > Im not really sure we should mask them anyway, with the card possibly
> > being gone... Will need to look into it further.
> 
> Hi Ian
> 
> What's the status of this patch? Are you going to queue it for 2.6.33?

Ian, ping? I still don't see this patch in any (Linus' / next) upstream 
tree and the merge window will be closing soon. Any update?

Thanks
Guennadi

> 
> Thanks
> Guennadi
> 
> > 
> > 2009/11/9 Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>:
> > > (re-adding accidentally dropped ML)
> > >
> > > On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Ian Molton wrote:
> > >
> > >> Well, I presume we want to know when the card gets removed :)
> > >
> > > Sure, that's why we shouldn't mask those interrupts:-) If they do get
> > > masked and missed, I do not know, if the interrupt remains pending in this
> > > case, because they never get detected then:)
> > >
> > >>
> > >> 2009/11/9 Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>:
> > >> > Hi Ian
> > >> >
> > >> > Why did you drop all CCs?
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Ian Molton wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> I havent looked at the consequences for the driver if a insert IRQ
> > >> >> occurs during IO, however it seems logical that we should not
> > >> >> permanently mask the IRQ.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I presume that the IRQ remains pending?
> > >> >
> > >> > Don't know, never checked. Is this important to know?
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks
> > >> > Guennadi
> > >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 2009/11/6 Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>:
> > >> >> > On SuperH platforms the SDHI controller does not produce any command IRQs
> > >> >> > after a completed IO. This leads to card-detect interrupts staying
> > >> >> > disabled. Do not disable card-detect interrupts on DATA IRQs.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
> > >> >> > ---
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Marked as RFC because I'm not really sure this is a correct approach to
> > >> >> > fix this problem, and whether this will have negative effect on other
> > >> >> > tmio_mmc MFD users.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h
> > >> >> > index c676767..0b31d44 100644
> > >> >> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h
> > >> >> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h
> > >> >> > @@ -55,10 +55,8 @@
> > >> >> >  /* Define some IRQ masks */
> > >> >> >  /* This is the mask used at reset by the chip */
> > >> >> >  #define TMIO_MASK_ALL           0x837f031d
> > >> >> > -#define TMIO_MASK_READOP  (TMIO_STAT_RXRDY | TMIO_STAT_DATAEND | \
> > >> >> > -               TMIO_STAT_CARD_REMOVE | TMIO_STAT_CARD_INSERT)
> > >> >> > -#define TMIO_MASK_WRITEOP (TMIO_STAT_TXRQ | TMIO_STAT_DATAEND | \
> > >> >> > -               TMIO_STAT_CARD_REMOVE | TMIO_STAT_CARD_INSERT)
> > >> >> > +#define TMIO_MASK_READOP  (TMIO_STAT_RXRDY | TMIO_STAT_DATAEND)
> > >> >> > +#define TMIO_MASK_WRITEOP (TMIO_STAT_TXRQ | TMIO_STAT_DATAEND)
> > >> >> >  #define TMIO_MASK_CMD     (TMIO_STAT_CMDRESPEND | TMIO_STAT_CMDTIMEOUT | \
> > >> >> >                TMIO_STAT_CARD_REMOVE | TMIO_STAT_CARD_INSERT)
> > >> >> >  #define TMIO_MASK_IRQ     (TMIO_MASK_READOP | TMIO_MASK_WRITEOP | TMIO_MASK_CMD)
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Guennadi
> > > ---
> > > Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
> > > Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
> > > http://www.open-technology.de/
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Ian Molton
> > Linux, Automotive, and other hacking:
> > http://www.mnementh.co.uk/
> > 
> 
> ---
> Guennadi Liakhovetski
> 

---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/