From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Barnabás Pőcze" <pobrn@protonmail.com>,
"Kieran Bingham" <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"Tomi Valkeinen" <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>,
"Hans Verkuil" <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
"Christophe JAILLET" <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] media: v4l2-dev: sysfs: Support streaming attribute
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 15:35:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7LdpQ9s7lS+x9mO@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y7LYp01J5co9KSfJ@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 01:14:15PM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 01:44:38AM +0000, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:
> > On 2022. december 26., hétfő 10:52, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 11:17:35PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> > >
> > > > Provide a streaming attribute to allow userspace to interogate if a device
> > > > is actively streaming or not.
> > > >
> > > > This will allow desktop notifications to report if a camera or device
> > > > is active on the system, rather than just 'open' which can occur when
> > > > configuring the device.
> > > >
> > > > Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/pipewire/-/issues/2669
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > This is a quick POC to see if such a facility makes sense.
> > > > I'm weary that not all video devices may have the queues registered on
> > > > the struct video_device, but this seems like an effective way to be able
> > > > to determine if a device is actively streaming on a system.
> > >
> > > I can imagine multiple problems, from race conditions to permissions and
> > > privacy. In order to comment on the fitness of this solution to address
> > > the problem you're trying to solve, could you describe the actual
> > > problem ?
> >
> > The issue is explained in the following thread:
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/pipewire/-/issues/2669#note_1697388
> >
> > In short, the user wants to show a "camera-in-use" indicator when the laptop camera
> > is used. The script that the user previously had only checked if /dev/video0
> > was open in any process, if it was, the indicator was shown. However, libcamera
> > - at least at the moment - keeps the file descriptor open as long as the Camera
> > object exists, which pipewire keeps alive for the entire lifetime of the device,
> > therefore the "camera-in-use" indicator is always shown.
>
> A sysfs attribute is not a great way to address this.
>
> libcamera certainly has information on whether streaming is ongoing. The
> information should come from there. Or Pipewire. Dbus perhaps?
I tend to agree, I think this is best solved in userspace where PipeWire
can have a centralized view of all cameras in the system, and of their
users.
> Alternatively libcamera could close the video devices while not streaming
> but that would involve e.g. releasing possible video buffer allocations as
> well, increasing streaming start latency.
Closing video (and subdev) nodes when the camera is not in use would be
good I think. It doesn't mean we have to open them when starting
capture, explicit open/close operation (or similar, maybe introducing a
capture session object in the libcamera API would also make sense, it
should be considered as part of the same issue) could help with this.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-02 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-23 23:17 [RFC PATCH] media: v4l2-dev: sysfs: Support streaming attribute Kieran Bingham
2022-12-26 9:52 ` Laurent Pinchart
2022-12-28 1:44 ` Barnabás Pőcze
2023-01-02 13:14 ` Sakari Ailus
2023-01-02 13:35 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2023-01-03 9:33 ` Kieran Bingham
2023-01-03 13:31 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-01-03 15:23 ` Kieran Bingham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y7LdpQ9s7lS+x9mO@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=pobrn@protonmail.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox