From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"DRI Development" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Jack Zhang" <Jack.Zhang1@amd.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
"Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, "Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Luben Tuikov" <luben.tuikov@amd.com>,
"Nirmoy Das" <nirmoy.aiemd@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] drm/sched: Add dependency tracking
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 17:26:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNSkGbtzNMMXJmDY@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9465ffc67bce199ad52f272d0c4f7103d61ae734.camel@pengutronix.de>
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 04:39:09PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 24.06.2021 um 16:00 +0200 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > Instead of just a callback we can just glue in the gem helpers that
> > panfrost, v3d and lima currently use. There's really not that many
> > ways to skin this cat.
> >
> > On the naming bikeshed: The idea for using _await_ to denote adding
> > dependencies to a job comes from i915, where that's used quite
> > extensively all over the place, in lots of datastructures.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> > Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> > Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> > Cc: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
> > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.aiemd@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> > Cc: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
> > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
> > Cc: Jack Zhang <Jack.Zhang1@amd.com>
> > Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 18 +++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 31 ++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> > index f7347c284886..b6f72fafd504 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> > @@ -211,6 +211,19 @@ static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct dma_fence *f,
> > job->sched->ops->free_job(job);
> > }
> >
> > +static struct dma_fence *
> > +drm_sched_job_dependency(struct drm_sched_job *job,
> > + struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
> > +{
> > + if (!xa_empty(&job->dependencies))
> > + return xa_erase(&job->dependencies, job->last_dependency++);
>
> Not sure how much it buys us now that you dedup fences before adding
> them to the xa, but we could avoid potentially avoid some ping-pong
> looping in the scheduler by checking if the fence we are about to
> return here is already signaled and skipping to the next one if so.
I think there's quit a bit of tricks you can play if the scheduler has
more direct visibility into all (or at least most) of the fences. I'm
really just trying to establish the drm_sched_job_await api so there's a
notch more structure to the dependency handling.
Iow bikesheds on the interface and testing on the patches is what I'm
looking for :-)
-Daniel
>
> Regards,
> Lucas
>
> > +
> > + if (job->sched->ops->dependency)
> > + return job->sched->ops->dependency(job, entity);
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs - Make sure all remaining jobs are killed
> > *
> > @@ -229,7 +242,7 @@ static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
> > struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence = job->s_fence;
> >
> > /* Wait for all dependencies to avoid data corruptions */
> > - while ((f = job->sched->ops->dependency(job, entity)))
> > + while ((f = drm_sched_job_dependency(job, entity)))
> > dma_fence_wait(f, false);
> >
> > drm_sched_fence_scheduled(s_fence);
> > @@ -419,7 +432,6 @@ static bool drm_sched_entity_add_dependency_cb(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
> > */
> > struct drm_sched_job *drm_sched_entity_pop_job(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
> > {
> > - struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched = entity->rq->sched;
> > struct drm_sched_job *sched_job;
> >
> > sched_job = to_drm_sched_job(spsc_queue_peek(&entity->job_queue));
> > @@ -427,7 +439,7 @@ struct drm_sched_job *drm_sched_entity_pop_job(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
> > return NULL;
> >
> > while ((entity->dependency =
> > - sched->ops->dependency(sched_job, entity))) {
> > + drm_sched_job_dependency(sched_job, entity))) {
> > trace_drm_sched_job_wait_dep(sched_job, entity->dependency);
> >
> > if (drm_sched_entity_add_dependency_cb(entity))
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > index 70eefed17e06..370c336d383f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > @@ -603,6 +603,8 @@ int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
> >
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&job->list);
> >
> > + xa_init_flags(&job->dependencies, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_init);
> > @@ -626,6 +628,98 @@ void drm_sched_job_arm(struct drm_sched_job *job)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_arm);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * drm_sched_job_await_fence - adds the fence as a job dependency
> > + * @job: scheduler job to add the dependencies to
> > + * @fence: the dma_fence to add to the list of dependencies.
> > + *
> > + * Note that @fence is consumed in both the success and error cases.
> > + *
> > + * Returns:
> > + * 0 on success, or an error on failing to expand the array.
> > + */
> > +int drm_sched_job_await_fence(struct drm_sched_job *job,
> > + struct dma_fence *fence)
> > +{
> > + struct dma_fence *entry;
> > + unsigned long index;
> > + u32 id = 0;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!fence)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* Deduplicate if we already depend on a fence from the same context.
> > + * This lets the size of the array of deps scale with the number of
> > + * engines involved, rather than the number of BOs.
> > + */
> > + xa_for_each(&job->dependencies, index, entry) {
> > + if (entry->context != fence->context)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (dma_fence_is_later(fence, entry)) {
> > + dma_fence_put(entry);
> > + xa_store(&job->dependencies, index, fence, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + } else {
> > + dma_fence_put(fence);
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = xa_alloc(&job->dependencies, &id, fence, xa_limit_32b, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (ret != 0)
> > + dma_fence_put(fence);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_await_fence);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * drm_sched_job_await_implicit - adds implicit dependencies as job dependencies
> > + * @job: scheduler job to add the dependencies to
> > + * @obj: the gem object to add new dependencies from.
> > + * @write: whether the job might write the object (so we need to depend on
> > + * shared fences in the reservation object).
> > + *
> > + * This should be called after drm_gem_lock_reservations() on your array of
> > + * GEM objects used in the job but before updating the reservations with your
> > + * own fences.
> > + *
> > + * Returns:
> > + * 0 on success, or an error on failing to expand the array.
> > + */
> > +int drm_sched_job_await_implicit(struct drm_sched_job *job,
> > + struct drm_gem_object *obj,
> > + bool write)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + struct dma_fence **fences;
> > + unsigned int i, fence_count;
> > +
> > + if (!write) {
> > + struct dma_fence *fence = dma_resv_get_excl_unlocked(obj->resv);
> > +
> > + return drm_sched_job_await_fence(job, fence);
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = dma_resv_get_fences(obj->resv, NULL, &fence_count, &fences);
> > + if (ret || !fence_count)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < fence_count; i++) {
> > + ret = drm_sched_job_await_fence(job, fences[i]);
> > + if (ret)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (; i < fence_count; i++)
> > + dma_fence_put(fences[i]);
> > + kfree(fences);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_await_implicit);
> > +
> > +
> > /**
> > * drm_sched_job_cleanup - clean up scheduler job resources
> > *
> > @@ -633,8 +727,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_arm);
> > */
> > void drm_sched_job_cleanup(struct drm_sched_job *job)
> > {
> > + struct dma_fence *fence;
> > + unsigned long index;
> > +
> > dma_fence_put(&job->s_fence->finished);
> > job->s_fence = NULL;
> > +
> > + xa_for_each(&job->dependencies, index, fence) {
> > + dma_fence_put(fence);
> > + }
> > + xa_destroy(&job->dependencies);
> > +
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_cleanup);
> >
> > diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> > index 80438d126c9d..e4d7e1496296 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> > @@ -27,9 +27,12 @@
> > #include <drm/spsc_queue.h>
> > #include <linux/dma-fence.h>
> > #include <linux/completion.h>
> > +#include <linux/xarray.h>
> >
> > #define MAX_WAIT_SCHED_ENTITY_Q_EMPTY msecs_to_jiffies(1000)
> >
> > +struct drm_gem_object;
> > +
> > struct drm_gpu_scheduler;
> > struct drm_sched_rq;
> >
> > @@ -198,6 +201,16 @@ struct drm_sched_job {
> > enum drm_sched_priority s_priority;
> > struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
> > struct dma_fence_cb cb;
> > + /**
> > + * @dependencies:
> > + *
> > + * Contains the dependencies as struct dma_fence for this job, see
> > + * drm_sched_job_await_fence() and drm_sched_job_await_implicit().
> > + */
> > + struct xarray dependencies;
> > +
> > + /** @last_dependency: tracks @dependencies as they signal */
> > + unsigned long last_dependency;
> > };
> >
> > static inline bool drm_sched_invalidate_job(struct drm_sched_job *s_job,
> > @@ -220,9 +233,14 @@ enum drm_gpu_sched_stat {
> > */
> > struct drm_sched_backend_ops {
> > /**
> > - * @dependency: Called when the scheduler is considering scheduling
> > - * this job next, to get another struct dma_fence for this job to
> > - * block on. Once it returns NULL, run_job() may be called.
> > + * @dependency:
> > + *
> > + * Called when the scheduler is considering scheduling this job next, to
> > + * get another struct dma_fence for this job to block on. Once it
> > + * returns NULL, run_job() may be called.
> > + *
> > + * If a driver exclusively uses drm_sched_job_await_fence() and
> > + * drm_sched_job_await_implicit() this can be ommitted and left as NULL.
> > */
> > struct dma_fence *(*dependency)(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job,
> > struct drm_sched_entity *s_entity);
> > @@ -314,6 +332,13 @@ int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
> > struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
> > void *owner);
> > void drm_sched_job_arm(struct drm_sched_job *job);
> > +int drm_sched_job_await_fence(struct drm_sched_job *job,
> > + struct dma_fence *fence);
> > +int drm_sched_job_await_implicit(struct drm_sched_job *job,
> > + struct drm_gem_object *obj,
> > + bool write);
> > +
> > +
> > void drm_sched_entity_modify_sched(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
> > struct drm_gpu_scheduler **sched_list,
> > unsigned int num_sched_list);
>
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-24 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210624140025.438303-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2021-06-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/sched: Split drm_sched_job_init Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 14:32 ` Steven Price
2021-06-24 17:29 ` Christian König
2021-06-24 17:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 17:39 ` Christian König
2021-06-24 18:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 20:45 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 21:00 ` Emma Anholt
2021-06-24 21:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/sched: Add dependency tracking Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 14:32 ` Steven Price
2021-06-24 14:39 ` Lucas Stach
2021-06-24 15:26 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2021-06-24 16:59 ` Christian König
2021-06-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/sched: drop entity parameter from drm_sched_push_job Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 14:32 ` Steven Price
2021-06-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/panfrost: use scheduler dependency tracking Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 14:32 ` Steven Price
2021-06-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/etnaviv: Use scheduler dependency handling Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/gem: Delete gem array fencing helpers Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YNSkGbtzNMMXJmDY@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=Jack.Zhang1@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
--cc=nirmoy.aiemd@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox