From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
Cc: hridya@google.com, john.stultz@linaro.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
gustavo@padovan.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
adelva@google.com, sspatil@google.com, daniel@ffwll.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: nuke DMA_FENCE_TRACE macros v2
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:55:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSdXEaBDpijEBx/6@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <015fd5ed-9255-9c28-44f3-3c8dde90ebad@gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:12:24AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Just a gentle ping. Daniel any more comments on this?
Still haven't seen a patch set to nuke the sw_sync igt tests. Otherwise
this is just going to cause fails and reboots in our ci (we reboot on
taints).
> I'm not sure if the second patch will cause trouble with any unit test, but
> I'm willing to try it. We can always trivial revert it.
See above, remove the igts and we should be fine I think. I don't think
there's any selftests or kselftests, but checking that should be a quick
grep at most.
-Daniel
>
> Thanks,
> Christian.
>
> Am 18.08.21 um 12:54 schrieb Christian König:
> > Only the DRM GPU scheduler, radeon and amdgpu where using them and they depend
> > on a non existing config option to actually emit some code.
> >
> > v2: keep the signal path as is for now
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c | 10 +---------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c | 24 ++++-------------------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c | 18 ++---------------
> > include/linux/dma-fence.h | 22 ---------------------
> > 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> > index 0b1c48590c43..c65994e382bd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> > @@ -246,7 +246,6 @@ bool amdgpu_fence_process(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> > struct amdgpu_fence_driver *drv = &ring->fence_drv;
> > struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
> > uint32_t seq, last_seq;
> > - int r;
> > do {
> > last_seq = atomic_read(&ring->fence_drv.last_seq);
> > @@ -278,12 +277,7 @@ bool amdgpu_fence_process(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> > if (!fence)
> > continue;
> > - r = dma_fence_signal(fence);
> > - if (!r)
> > - DMA_FENCE_TRACE(fence, "signaled from irq context\n");
> > - else
> > - BUG();
> > -
> > + dma_fence_signal(fence);
> > dma_fence_put(fence);
> > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(adev_to_drm(adev)->dev);
> > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(adev_to_drm(adev)->dev);
> > @@ -639,8 +633,6 @@ static bool amdgpu_fence_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *f)
> > if (!timer_pending(&ring->fence_drv.fallback_timer))
> > amdgpu_fence_schedule_fallback(ring);
> > - DMA_FENCE_TRACE(&fence->base, "armed on ring %i!\n", ring->idx);
> > -
> > return true;
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
> > index 18f2c2e0dfb3..3f351d222cbb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
> > @@ -176,18 +176,11 @@ static int radeon_fence_check_signaled(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned mode,
> > */
> > seq = atomic64_read(&fence->rdev->fence_drv[fence->ring].last_seq);
> > if (seq >= fence->seq) {
> > - int ret = dma_fence_signal_locked(&fence->base);
> > -
> > - if (!ret)
> > - DMA_FENCE_TRACE(&fence->base, "signaled from irq context\n");
> > - else
> > - DMA_FENCE_TRACE(&fence->base, "was already signaled\n");
> > -
> > + dma_fence_signal_locked(&fence->base);
> > radeon_irq_kms_sw_irq_put(fence->rdev, fence->ring);
> > __remove_wait_queue(&fence->rdev->fence_queue, &fence->fence_wake);
> > dma_fence_put(&fence->base);
> > - } else
> > - DMA_FENCE_TRACE(&fence->base, "pending\n");
> > + }
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -422,8 +415,6 @@ static bool radeon_fence_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *f)
> > fence->fence_wake.func = radeon_fence_check_signaled;
> > __add_wait_queue(&rdev->fence_queue, &fence->fence_wake);
> > dma_fence_get(f);
> > -
> > - DMA_FENCE_TRACE(&fence->base, "armed on ring %i!\n", fence->ring);
> > return true;
> > }
> > @@ -441,11 +432,7 @@ bool radeon_fence_signaled(struct radeon_fence *fence)
> > return true;
> > if (radeon_fence_seq_signaled(fence->rdev, fence->seq, fence->ring)) {
> > - int ret;
> > -
> > - ret = dma_fence_signal(&fence->base);
> > - if (!ret)
> > - DMA_FENCE_TRACE(&fence->base, "signaled from radeon_fence_signaled\n");
> > + dma_fence_signal(&fence->base);
> > return true;
> > }
> > return false;
> > @@ -550,7 +537,6 @@ long radeon_fence_wait_timeout(struct radeon_fence *fence, bool intr, long timeo
> > {
> > uint64_t seq[RADEON_NUM_RINGS] = {};
> > long r;
> > - int r_sig;
> > /*
> > * This function should not be called on !radeon fences.
> > @@ -567,9 +553,7 @@ long radeon_fence_wait_timeout(struct radeon_fence *fence, bool intr, long timeo
> > return r;
> > }
> > - r_sig = dma_fence_signal(&fence->base);
> > - if (!r_sig)
> > - DMA_FENCE_TRACE(&fence->base, "signaled from fence_wait\n");
> > + dma_fence_signal(&fence->base);
> > return r;
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
> > index 69de2c76731f..3736746c47bd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
> > @@ -50,26 +50,12 @@ static void __exit drm_sched_fence_slab_fini(void)
> > void drm_sched_fence_scheduled(struct drm_sched_fence *fence)
> > {
> > - int ret = dma_fence_signal(&fence->scheduled);
> > -
> > - if (!ret)
> > - DMA_FENCE_TRACE(&fence->scheduled,
> > - "signaled from irq context\n");
> > - else
> > - DMA_FENCE_TRACE(&fence->scheduled,
> > - "was already signaled\n");
> > + dma_fence_signal(&fence->scheduled);
> > }
> > void drm_sched_fence_finished(struct drm_sched_fence *fence)
> > {
> > - int ret = dma_fence_signal(&fence->finished);
> > -
> > - if (!ret)
> > - DMA_FENCE_TRACE(&fence->finished,
> > - "signaled from irq context\n");
> > - else
> > - DMA_FENCE_TRACE(&fence->finished,
> > - "was already signaled\n");
> > + dma_fence_signal(&fence->finished);
> > }
> > static const char *drm_sched_fence_get_driver_name(struct dma_fence *fence)
> > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> > index 6ffb4b2c6371..4cc119ab272f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> > @@ -590,26 +590,4 @@ struct dma_fence *dma_fence_get_stub(void);
> > struct dma_fence *dma_fence_allocate_private_stub(void);
> > u64 dma_fence_context_alloc(unsigned num);
> > -#define DMA_FENCE_TRACE(f, fmt, args...) \
> > - do { \
> > - struct dma_fence *__ff = (f); \
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_FENCE_TRACE)) \
> > - pr_info("f %llu#%llu: " fmt, \
> > - __ff->context, __ff->seqno, ##args); \
> > - } while (0)
> > -
> > -#define DMA_FENCE_WARN(f, fmt, args...) \
> > - do { \
> > - struct dma_fence *__ff = (f); \
> > - pr_warn("f %llu#%llu: " fmt, __ff->context, __ff->seqno,\
> > - ##args); \
> > - } while (0)
> > -
> > -#define DMA_FENCE_ERR(f, fmt, args...) \
> > - do { \
> > - struct dma_fence *__ff = (f); \
> > - pr_err("f %llu#%llu: " fmt, __ff->context, __ff->seqno, \
> > - ##args); \
> > - } while (0)
> > -
> > #endif /* __LINUX_DMA_FENCE_H */
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-26 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-18 10:54 [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: nuke DMA_FENCE_TRACE macros v2 Christian König
2021-08-18 10:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf: taint the kernel on sw_sync use Christian König
2021-08-24 8:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: nuke DMA_FENCE_TRACE macros v2 Christian König
2021-08-26 8:55 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2021-08-27 9:07 ` Christian König
2021-08-27 20:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-30 6:28 ` Christian König
2021-08-31 12:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-31 12:39 ` Christian König
2021-08-31 12:44 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YSdXEaBDpijEBx/6@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=adelva@google.com \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=hridya@google.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sspatil@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox