From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EECC433FE for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 13:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F724610E6 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 13:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233235AbhINNkS (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:40:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54440 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233172AbhINNkP (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:40:15 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B67FC061762 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 06:38:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id 140so5886683wma.0 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 06:38:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=Y4e5uc+b/mXvn82YV560U0kDtuDse53Hm+g6AvhQ+10=; b=cRCGLSjpOumdJWDUZpWUygx0y5XwpVaxvf0ABlKpZc4NDoxDDxSU1Bm6TePvE3ZCR7 z2Fhwwrp4ZzquB4zaVLA08XBG+Kdhd0tEfg0fzVXF6WvTlOe2cgpTjqJsUZvg0VJj2PB xdd2lsKtIYiVDJPebDIntj9d47YW3lhkKXJJs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=Y4e5uc+b/mXvn82YV560U0kDtuDse53Hm+g6AvhQ+10=; b=j8CjyVMb0TBjRydp8lPUJgd9iD8ci923YczEbhQI5bDm8In9wZnZrQXPYq73m85KQr SBQxYr2sXY3nI2/LfTm6q2TpoB+yjIVIvTjUpKGxs4JPhXCDv7KYrKFGg+1C6236ymbk Zpm+txEfM21vcNLTQ/goBKAcAn72+c3SlPKgj/71B4U8sHf2DPn4NriPKpe0xWPDRdyX 8XRp50Bm6OF6eCBnb9lLgkCCbTQzrdp96n7uvYFdVn1wWMEbBIvCddhwzBtr3S9d+App jMp6cRu/FrzIRg8o+69kT++gAqiVuXjGxtHdAA2gW7NZ5D50MgeVL0DNwIq+c3ZCuVS/ RquQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5309iTYYE0vnrdCh+7vNHtCArQZjIVmBZYu2wyIzOAFrjjEGb0Dk 22vTNq27yOMByFRf2WyAkSfOIA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy44heDH0/myzM0p4WV8kDMxZciiPNEvcqA3vLhsHkOYn6T2IYrGqjVF1OkN3TnBwEJXU4emg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c903:: with SMTP id f3mr2326509wmb.101.1631626736944; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 06:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local ([2a02:168:57f4:0:efd0:b9e5:5ae6:c2fa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j18sm10195344wro.1.2021.09.14.06.38.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 06:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:38:53 +0200 From: Daniel Vetter To: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= Cc: Rob Clark , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, Michel =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= , Pekka Paalanen , Rob Clark , David Airlie , Sumit Semwal , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Tian Tao , Steven Price , Melissa Wen , Luben Tuikov , Andrey Grodzovsky , Boris Brezillon , Jack Zhang , open list , "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] drm/scheduler: Add fence deadline support Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Rob Clark , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, Michel =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= , Pekka Paalanen , Rob Clark , David Airlie , Sumit Semwal , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Tian Tao , Steven Price , Melissa Wen , Luben Tuikov , Andrey Grodzovsky , Boris Brezillon , Jack Zhang , open list , "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" References: <20210903184806.1680887-1-robdclark@gmail.com> <20210903184806.1680887-5-robdclark@gmail.com> <0bb5f8e0-9c42-c97f-16bd-8dbe0f878157@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <0bb5f8e0-9c42-c97f-16bd-8dbe0f878157@gmail.com> X-Operating-System: Linux phenom 5.10.0-8-amd64 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 08:22:59AM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Am 08.09.21 um 19:45 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 11:47:55AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote: > > > From: Rob Clark > > > > > > As the finished fence is the one that is exposed to userspace, and > > > therefore the one that other operations, like atomic update, would > > > block on, we need to propagate the deadline from from the finished > > > fence to the actual hw fence. > > > > > > v2: Split into drm_sched_fence_set_parent() (ckoenig) > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 2 +- > > > include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 8 ++++++ > > > 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c > > > index bcea035cf4c6..4fc41a71d1c7 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c > > > @@ -128,6 +128,30 @@ static void drm_sched_fence_release_finished(struct dma_fence *f) > > > dma_fence_put(&fence->scheduled); > > > } > > > +static void drm_sched_fence_set_deadline_finished(struct dma_fence *f, > > > + ktime_t deadline) > > > +{ > > > + struct drm_sched_fence *fence = to_drm_sched_fence(f); > > > + unsigned long flags; > > > + > > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&fence->lock, flags); > > > + > > > + /* If we already have an earlier deadline, keep it: */ > > > + if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_HAS_DEADLINE_BIT, &f->flags) && > > > + ktime_before(fence->deadline, deadline)) { > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fence->lock, flags); > > > + return; > > > + } > > > + > > > + fence->deadline = deadline; > > > + set_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_HAS_DEADLINE_BIT, &f->flags); > > > + > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fence->lock, flags); > > > + > > > + if (fence->parent) > > > + dma_fence_set_deadline(fence->parent, deadline); > > > +} > > > + > > > static const struct dma_fence_ops drm_sched_fence_ops_scheduled = { > > > .get_driver_name = drm_sched_fence_get_driver_name, > > > .get_timeline_name = drm_sched_fence_get_timeline_name, > > > @@ -138,6 +162,7 @@ static const struct dma_fence_ops drm_sched_fence_ops_finished = { > > > .get_driver_name = drm_sched_fence_get_driver_name, > > > .get_timeline_name = drm_sched_fence_get_timeline_name, > > > .release = drm_sched_fence_release_finished, > > > + .set_deadline = drm_sched_fence_set_deadline_finished, > > > }; > > > struct drm_sched_fence *to_drm_sched_fence(struct dma_fence *f) > > > @@ -152,6 +177,15 @@ struct drm_sched_fence *to_drm_sched_fence(struct dma_fence *f) > > > } > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(to_drm_sched_fence); > > > +void drm_sched_fence_set_parent(struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence, > > > + struct dma_fence *fence) > > > +{ > > > + s_fence->parent = dma_fence_get(fence); > > > + if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_HAS_DEADLINE_BIT, > > > + &s_fence->finished.flags)) > > Don't you need the spinlock here too to avoid races? test_bit is very > > unordered, so guarantees nothing. Spinlock would need to be both around > > ->parent = and the test_bit. > > > > Entirely aside, but there's discussions going on to preallocate the hw > > fence somehow. If we do that we could make the deadline forwarding > > lockless here. Having a spinlock just to set the parent is a bit annoying > > Well previously we didn't needed the spinlock to set the parent because the > parent wasn't used outside of the main thread. > > This becomes an issue now because we can race with setting the deadline. So > yeah we probably do need the spinlock here now. Yeah tbh this is the part I don't like, because it means the scheduler thread locking becomes more complex. We might need to look at this again when we include stuff like boosting priorities and things like that. Maybe it would be better if we have a request queue which the scheduler thread could then pick up whenever it gets around to the next scheduling decision? I think for now just the spinlock in more places should be fine. -Daniel > Christian. > > > ... > > > > Alternative is that you do this locklessly with barriers and a _lot_ of > > comments. Would be good to benchmark whether the overhead matters though > > first. > > -Daniel > > > > > + dma_fence_set_deadline(fence, s_fence->deadline); > > > +} > > > + > > > struct drm_sched_fence *drm_sched_fence_alloc(struct drm_sched_entity *entity, > > > void *owner) > > > { > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c > > > index 595e47ff7d06..27bf0ac0625f 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c > > > @@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ static int drm_sched_main(void *param) > > > drm_sched_fence_scheduled(s_fence); > > > if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fence)) { > > > - s_fence->parent = dma_fence_get(fence); > > > + drm_sched_fence_set_parent(s_fence, fence); > > > r = dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &sched_job->cb, > > > drm_sched_job_done_cb); > > > if (r == -ENOENT) > > > diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h > > > index 7f77a455722c..158ddd662469 100644 > > > --- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h > > > +++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h > > > @@ -238,6 +238,12 @@ struct drm_sched_fence { > > > */ > > > struct dma_fence finished; > > > + /** > > > + * @deadline: deadline set on &drm_sched_fence.finished which > > > + * potentially needs to be propagated to &drm_sched_fence.parent > > > + */ > > > + ktime_t deadline; > > > + > > > /** > > > * @parent: the fence returned by &drm_sched_backend_ops.run_job > > > * when scheduling the job on hardware. We signal the > > > @@ -505,6 +511,8 @@ void drm_sched_entity_set_priority(struct drm_sched_entity *entity, > > > enum drm_sched_priority priority); > > > bool drm_sched_entity_is_ready(struct drm_sched_entity *entity); > > > +void drm_sched_fence_set_parent(struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence, > > > + struct dma_fence *fence); > > > struct drm_sched_fence *drm_sched_fence_alloc( > > > struct drm_sched_entity *s_entity, void *owner); > > > void drm_sched_fence_init(struct drm_sched_fence *fence, > > > -- > > > 2.31.1 > > > > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch