From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@gmail.com>
Cc: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@hust.edu.cn>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
gushengxian <gushengxian@yulong.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>, Sean Young <sean@mess.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: flexcop-usb: fix sanity check of bNumEndpoints
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:29:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqLy3QpRxnSrj7ge@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD-N9QVQpm87wpCnLj08db3kAr=b191op3=ESOMm1yh7UWu4jw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 09:27:27AM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 10:00 PM Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 09:42:15AM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 2:45 PM Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > Are you sure that d725d20e81c2 ("media: flexcop-usb: sanity checking of
> > > > endpoint type) was correct?
> > >
> > > I am not sure if fc_usb->uintf->cur_altsetting->endpoint[1] is right or not.
> > >
> > > But the sanity check of bNumEndpoints does not match the following dereference.
> >
> > I should know better than try to be subtle on the internet: Your fix is
> > wrong.
> >
> > You need to try to understand the code you're changing. Not just do
> > pattern matching.
>
> I see. Yeah, I have such an incorrect assumption - previous commits
> should be somehow correct since maintainers already review them.
Everyone makes mistakes and our review process isn't perfect.
And if your assumption was correct we wouldn't have any bugs at all.
> Next time, I will dig more about the code logic and try to post a more
> comprehensive patch.
Sounds good.
> > > > > Fixes: d725d20e81c2 ("media: flexcop-usb: sanity checking of endpoint type")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@gmail.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/media/usb/b2c2/flexcop-usb.c | 2 +-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/b2c2/flexcop-usb.c b/drivers/media/usb/b2c2/flexcop-usb.c
> > > > > index 7835bb0f32fc..eb54bfdda01f 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/b2c2/flexcop-usb.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/b2c2/flexcop-usb.c
> > > > > @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int flexcop_usb_init(struct flexcop_usb *fc_usb)
> > > > > return ret;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > - if (fc_usb->uintf->cur_altsetting->desc.bNumEndpoints < 1)
> > > > > + if (fc_usb->uintf->cur_altsetting->desc.bNumEndpoints < 2)
> > > > > return -ENODEV;
> > > > > if (!usb_endpoint_is_isoc_in(&fc_usb->uintf->cur_altsetting->endpoint[1].desc))
> > > > > return -ENODEV;
> > > >
> > > > It looks like it should have verified the type of endpoint[0] here
> > > > instead.
> > >
> > > This sanity check originally makes sure the
> > > fc_usb->uintf->cur_altsetting->endpoint[0] in
> > > flexcop_usb_transfer_init.
> >
> > Yes, and that is the only endpoint that this driver uses.
>
> This needs an understanding of the working mechanism of this hardware.
Not really, you only need to look at the driver in this case. But sure,
you need some familiarity with USB to understand what is going on.
Johan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-10 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-02 5:50 [PATCH] media: flexcop-usb: fix sanity check of bNumEndpoints Dongliang Mu
2022-06-02 6:45 ` Johan Hovold
2022-06-09 1:42 ` Dongliang Mu
2022-06-09 14:00 ` Johan Hovold
2022-06-10 1:27 ` Dongliang Mu
2022-06-10 7:29 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YqLy3QpRxnSrj7ge@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=dzm91@hust.edu.cn \
--cc=gushengxian@yulong.com \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mudongliangabcd@gmail.com \
--cc=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=sean@mess.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox