From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9946645C18; Thu, 3 Apr 2025 14:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743689157; cv=none; b=eTdBWRffYICO6WfG8s0NWdl0wSZMSTJOXj5EnuJFMO+qnDbIayT5/vwLZzMv35Wa3SO/AxtSHm5TQDd+wcl16XktN8zVngwMYMCg9VYjwfWP2LW5cn49TAMvWnsSvOWQN+yoGA1Prz6nIWxLNKVtaS28BiWsnlQkoSr8u3R5Ks0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743689157; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PYnPutNqMUnp5M2wGqeL7kuooL43hFPQyqTo7HkQ9/o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DjLarr8ie1kO3OEomJtu+1I8wO5sou9ukUOx7FNnRlF3fBjbvJxzPlKnd4vpMqSg/NuWyR9i7qFx8ry5lxOOSGhsdcYBGXEPU5VnvdJF9M5LruU+EebnnIgrB5QB1JfWilnB9dd0DP2IG379ENxBBQ/A649JrzYIfcG/eX9f7fg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: GlR9QPOUTf+EyGoMiCMokg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: cmEpQjOPQH6lwwsCUCBd3A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11393"; a="44983421" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,184,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="44983421" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Apr 2025 07:05:55 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: wnwoBHTBQKC+Zas90gmtmQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ltcCiUu0TZ6rpx3QYERWYg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,184,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="131145303" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.58]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Apr 2025 07:05:52 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u0LCX-00000008pfL-3xe1; Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:05:49 +0300 Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 17:05:49 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Hans de Goede Cc: Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= , Dan Scally , Alan Stern , Sakari Ailus , Hao Yao , Bingbu Cao , Duane , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] platform/x86: int3472: Add handshake pin support Message-ID: References: <20250402202510.432888-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <37de4bf2-c6c1-4d16-9f04-c0d9152dfe7b@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <37de4bf2-c6c1-4d16-9f04-c0d9152dfe7b@redhat.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 12:30:29PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 2-Apr-25 11:02 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 11:25 PM Hans de Goede wrote: ... > > Offtopic: I sent you a message asking about AtomISP patch queue > > status, but no answer. I understand that you are kinda very busy, > > still it seems we missed one cycle for the patches you already have in > > your queue. I haven't investigated where the bottle neck happened, > > though. Hence just asking what's the plan with them and other patches > > that are already in the mailing list (I have received at least two > > that I was Cc'ed on). > > Yeah, I've been burried in work a bit, so this fall through the cracks. > > I've some more bandwidth now and I have a mailfolder with all > the pending atomisp patches in there. I plan to start merging these > soon and to send out an atomisp pull-request for 6.15 well in time. Ah, cool! Don't hesitate to ask for a review the patches I haven't seen for AtomISP driver. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko