From: Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Olivier Masse" <olivier.masse@nxp.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Yong Wu" <yong.wu@mediatek.com>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Benjamin Gaignard" <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
"Brian Starkey" <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>,
"John Stultz" <jstultz@google.com>,
"T . J . Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Sumit Garg" <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
azarrabi@qti.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] TEE subsystem for restricted dma-buf allocations
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 12:06:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2KsuAs-Dd4ZDaXR@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241217100809.3962439-1-jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:07:36AM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch set allocates the restricted DMA-bufs via the TEE subsystem.
>
> The TEE subsystem handles the DMA-buf allocations since it is the TEE
> (OP-TEE, AMD-TEE, TS-TEE, or perhaps a future QCOMTEE) which sets up the
> restrictions for the memory used for the DMA-bufs.
>
> I've added a new IOCTL, TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC, to allocate the restricted
> DMA-bufs. This IOCTL reaches the backend TEE driver, allowing it to choose
> how to allocate the restricted physical memory.
>
> TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC takes in addition to a size and flags parameters also
> a use-case parameter. This is used by the backend TEE driver to decide on
> allocation policy and which devices should be able to access the memory.
>
> Three use-cases (Secure Video Playback, Trusted UI, and Secure Video
> Recording) has been identified so far to serve as examples of what can be
> expected. More use-cases can be added in userspace ABI, but it's up to the
> backend TEE drivers to provide the implementation.
>
> Each use-case has it's own restricted memory pool since different use-cases
> requires isolation from different parts of the system. A restricted memory
> pool can be based on a static carveout instantiated while probing the TEE
> backend driver, or dynamically allocated from CMA and made restricted as
> needed by the TEE.
>
> This can be tested on QEMU with the following steps:
> repo init -u https://github.com/jenswi-linaro/manifest.git -m qemu_v8.xml \
> -b prototype/sdp-v4
> repo sync -j8
> cd build
> make toolchains -j$(nproc)
> make SPMC_AT_EL=1 all -j$(nproc)
> make SPMC_AT_EL=1 run-only
> # login and at the prompt:
> xtest --sdp-basic
>
> The SPMC_AT_EL=1 parameter configures the build with FF-A and an SPMC at
> S-EL1 inside OP-TEE. The parameter can be changed into SPMC_AT_EL=n to test
> without FF-A using the original SMC ABI instead. Please remember to do
> %rm -rf ../trusted-firmware-a/build/qemu
> for TF-A to be rebuilt properly using the new configuration.
>
> https://optee.readthedocs.io/en/latest/building/prerequisites.html
> list dependencies needed to build the above.
>
> The tests are pretty basic, mostly checking that a Trusted Application in
> the secure world can access and manipulate the memory. There are also some
> negative tests for out of bounds buffers etc.
I think I've dropped this on earlier encrypted dma-buf discussions for
TEE, but can't find one right now ...
Do we have some open source userspace for this? To my knowledge we have
two implementations of encrypted/content protected dma-buf in upstream
right now in the amd and intel gpu drivers, and unless I'm mistaken they
both have some minimal userspace supporting EXT_protected_textures:
https://github.com/KhronosGroup/OpenGL-Registry/blob/main/extensions/EXT/EXT_protected_textures.txt
It's not great, but it does just barely clear the bar in my opinion. I
guess something in gstreamer or similar video pipeline framework would
also do the job.
Especially with the context of the uapi discussion in the v1/RFC thread I
think we need more than a bare-bones testcase to make sure this works in
actual use.
Cheers, Sima
>
> Thanks,
> Jens
>
> Changes since V3:
> * Make the use_case and flags field in struct tee_shm u32's instead of
> u16's
> * Add more description for TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC in the header file
> * Import namespace DMA_BUF in module tee, reported by lkp@intel.com
> * Added a note in the commit message for "optee: account for direction
> while converting parameters" why it's needed
> * Factor out dynamic restricted memory allocation from
> "optee: support restricted memory allocation" into two new commits
> "optee: FF-A: dynamic restricted memory allocation" and
> "optee: smc abi: dynamic restricted memory allocation"
> * Guard CMA usage with #ifdef CONFIG_CMA, effectively disabling dynamic
> restricted memory allocate if CMA isn't configured
>
> Changes since the V2 RFC:
> * Based on v6.12
> * Replaced the flags for SVP and Trusted UID memory with a u32 field with
> unique id for each use case
> * Added dynamic allocation of restricted memory pools
> * Added OP-TEE ABI both with and without FF-A for dynamic restricted memory
> * Added support for FF-A with FFA_LEND
>
> Changes since the V1 RFC:
> * Based on v6.11
> * Complete rewrite, replacing the restricted heap with TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC
>
> Changes since Olivier's post [2]:
> * Based on Yong Wu's post [1] where much of dma-buf handling is done in
> the generic restricted heap
> * Simplifications and cleanup
> * New commit message for "dma-buf: heaps: add Linaro restricted dmabuf heap
> support"
> * Replaced the word "secure" with "restricted" where applicable
>
> Jens Wiklander (6):
> tee: add restricted memory allocation
> optee: account for direction while converting parameters
> optee: sync secure world ABI headers
> optee: support restricted memory allocation
> optee: FF-A: dynamic restricted memory allocation
> optee: smc abi: dynamic restricted memory allocation
>
> drivers/tee/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/tee/optee/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/tee/optee/call.c | 10 +-
> drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 1 +
> drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c | 178 +++++++++++++-
> drivers/tee/optee/optee_ffa.h | 27 ++-
> drivers/tee/optee/optee_msg.h | 65 ++++-
> drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 75 ++++--
> drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h | 71 +++++-
> drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 31 ++-
> drivers/tee/optee/rstmem.c | 388 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 213 ++++++++++++++--
> drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 38 ++-
> drivers/tee/tee_private.h | 2 +
> drivers/tee/tee_rstmem.c | 201 ++++++++++++++++
> drivers/tee/tee_shm.c | 2 +
> drivers/tee/tee_shm_pool.c | 69 +++++-
> include/linux/tee_core.h | 15 ++
> include/linux/tee_drv.h | 2 +
> include/uapi/linux/tee.h | 44 +++-
> 20 files changed, 1358 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/tee/optee/rstmem.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/tee/tee_rstmem.c
>
>
> base-commit: fac04efc5c793dccbd07e2d59af9f90b7fc0dca4
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Simona Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-18 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-17 10:07 [PATCH v4 0/6] TEE subsystem for restricted dma-buf allocations Jens Wiklander
2024-12-17 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] tee: add restricted memory allocation Jens Wiklander
2025-01-08 16:54 ` Simona Vetter
2025-01-09 7:17 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-02-13 8:44 ` Boris Brezillon
2024-12-17 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] optee: account for direction while converting parameters Jens Wiklander
2024-12-17 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] optee: sync secure world ABI headers Jens Wiklander
2024-12-17 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] optee: support restricted memory allocation Jens Wiklander
2024-12-17 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] optee: FF-A: dynamic " Jens Wiklander
2024-12-20 14:38 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-21 9:40 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-17 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] optee: smc abi: " Jens Wiklander
2024-12-18 11:06 ` Simona Vetter [this message]
2024-12-24 6:35 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] TEE subsystem for restricted dma-buf allocations Sumit Garg
2024-12-24 9:28 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-12-24 9:32 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-12-24 10:00 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-12-26 5:59 ` Sumit Garg
2024-12-26 11:26 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-01-08 17:00 ` Simona Vetter
2025-01-08 16:57 ` Simona Vetter
2025-01-09 6:08 ` Sumit Garg
2025-02-12 19:56 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-02-13 6:41 ` Sumit Garg
2025-02-13 8:19 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-02-13 8:35 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-02-13 9:16 ` Sumit Garg
2025-02-13 12:40 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-02-13 14:05 ` Daniel Stone
2025-02-13 15:57 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-02-13 17:39 ` Daniel Stone
2025-02-14 10:07 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-02-14 13:07 ` Sumit Garg
2025-02-14 15:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-02-17 6:12 ` Sumit Garg
2025-02-18 16:22 ` Daniel Stone
2025-02-19 13:22 ` Simona Vetter
2025-02-21 11:24 ` Sumit Garg
2025-02-21 14:12 ` Daniel Stone
2025-03-04 7:17 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-03-04 7:45 ` Sumit Garg
2025-03-18 18:38 ` Nicolas Dufresne
2025-03-19 7:37 ` Jens Wiklander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z2KsuAs-Dd4ZDaXR@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=Brian.Starkey@arm.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=azarrabi@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=olivier.masse@nxp.com \
--cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
--cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox