From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>,
Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 09:51:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_9Ta5CpplHUTK_X@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250414100409.3910312-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 01:01:52PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> OF and ACPI currently are using asymmetrical APIs to check
> for the firmware node type. Unify them by using is_*_node()
> against struct fwnode_handle pointer.
Note, media CI complains on wrong {} style, but
1) it was in the original code;
2) it is gone after the whole series applied.
I suggest to ignore that report based on the above.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-14 10:01 [PATCH v4 0/7] i2c: core: Move client towards fwnode Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] i2c: core: Drop duplicate check before calling OF APIs Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 6:51 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-04-16 6:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] i2c: core: Switch to fwnode APIs to get IRQ Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-15 20:06 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 6:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] i2c: core: Reuse fwnode variable where it makes sense Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] i2c: core: Do not dereference fwnode in struct device Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 6:55 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 7:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 7:20 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 7:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] i2c: core: Deprecate of_node in struct i2c_board_info Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-15 20:10 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 6:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 6:54 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 7:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 13:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-16 15:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Remove of_node assignment Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_9Ta5CpplHUTK_X@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox