From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96BA31B6CE5; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 14:48:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744123741; cv=none; b=mNHZZrkJbEeqUe+ikrk/zgGIaV+ZqJQ2awckd1nC5QBgSJR8+hq5PTkbkDEshLVzwBhWIZuzg5RI+m2OgJ4yev/qSBaQ+yBqZhflO3duVBXrE+p1tANbQq8gLt9KFtDzEjFASzikRupSLQwUucozKhEvwguIePOsh8+OFWhrOVc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744123741; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aeGG/G4C0WrUQMHmkDPtULd/jCcQyouQwWePL/m/5VY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=F3wmJcBrN3ZyXQfbBd/2S6Yr09upQGKMVad7dXsomasPIJBk7kF3M8kWbOoFumjOovcCsC2TORf/m8MGu3xhsD1fazmsCIOsHls1SDFT3pD8KjhEF5WGCQGxGLHUOisGx2m99u0WzahMzBwTx51BrdbCAlPfStWW1YHy0ZmxJNk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=TYJhIm2v; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="TYJhIm2v" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1744123740; x=1775659740; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=aeGG/G4C0WrUQMHmkDPtULd/jCcQyouQwWePL/m/5VY=; b=TYJhIm2v2pqg8djm7bP45an9+iRBphg3JVhA6RjuVggrNBg5EE9T30ct OjAoRkoi/eYXIaWNKl1YGUf0t/s/UMnDUxhhc/PiV+35uoktQiXQpwzsh 3WwGX4Hn2ZrJbGG1MmhepEDIV8wHQpWprARmNOEz+U7dlw0Goqve4MqDT 72DkGQuS3hrzDah6moYh1xR3drdK3UkD+jb+27GzCneGpNhmw/UgU7uTw mMi1kpMh2VrQtYFFfudzWIcy3GGuVkAO0hakTjmk2R227I9KjGo5oJPpo zJN6oTCLIl47ftHPOIzrkHVZEsN0CKawu44ajM0eqtR6ge3EtUTC75y3f A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Nut49xbvT/KsMgcVGo1tIA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: r6QF81UXQW2Bq7fFjeH1Eg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11397"; a="49220183" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,198,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="49220183" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Apr 2025 07:48:58 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ijXW++7sTpm5XfSZsoru8w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: dntfW6/RQdK+B4TjSfJJBQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,198,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="133442752" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.58]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Apr 2025 07:48:55 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u2AFx-0000000AQvz-143C; Tue, 08 Apr 2025 17:48:53 +0300 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 17:48:53 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sakari Ailus Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Tomi Valkeinen , Jai Luthra , Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] i2c: core: Move client towards fwnode Message-ID: References: <20250407154937.744466-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 02:43:40PM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 06:44:56PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > The struct i2c_board_info has of_node and fwnode members. This is quite > > confusing as they are of the same semantics and it's tend to have an issue > > if user assigns both. Luckily there is only a single driver that does this > > and fix is provided in the last patch. Nevertheless the series moves > > the client handling code to use fwnode and deprecates the of_node member > > in the respective documentation. > > > > Tomi tested the last patch, but since it was separate there is no tag (yet). > > Apart from the two minor commit message comments: > > Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus Thank you for your review! Does it imply that media patch can go via I²C subsystem? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko