From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.au@gmail.com>
Cc: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: i2c: ov5645: Move the register 0x3008 from ov5645_global_init_setting
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:31:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zcx6Ty2tu_ZGdURj@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADT+UeDNFBTvRMHd4_J85Yz0RYED4ioG9wjUe4C0X4x6LzVD9w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 610 bytes --]
Hi Biju,
> I think it is different here. That 1 msec is delay associated with
> applying hardware power see [1]
Okay, ack.
> I will restore it.
Thanks!
I had meanwhile another thought. What if we kind of merge the two
patches, so the outcome is basically this:
In ov5645_set_register_array:
If (settings->reg == 0x3008 && settings->val == 0x82)
usleep_range(1000, 2000)
?
Then, we don't need to split the array and we are also future proof if
we ever need to set the reset bit again somewhere else.
Bonus points for replacing 0x82 with a define :)
What do you think?
Happy hacking,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-14 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-13 14:02 [PATCH 0/2] Fix OV5645 capture issue with 400kHz i2c bus frequency Biju Das
2024-02-13 14:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] media: i2c: ov5645: Move the register 0x3008 from ov5645_global_init_setting Biju Das
2024-02-13 22:27 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-02-14 7:44 ` Biju Das
2024-02-14 8:31 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2024-02-14 20:25 ` Biju Das
2024-02-14 20:49 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-02-14 20:54 ` Biju Das
2024-02-14 20:57 ` Biju Das
2024-02-14 23:34 ` Kieran Bingham
2024-02-13 14:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] media: i2c: ov5645: Add a small delay after writes in ov5645_set_register_array() Biju Das
2024-02-13 22:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-02-14 20:30 ` Biju Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zcx6Ty2tu_ZGdURj@ninjato \
--to=wsa@kernel.org \
--cc=biju.das.au@gmail.com \
--cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox