From: veeras@codeaurora.org
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
sumit.semwal@linaro.org, gustavo@padovan.org, airlied@linux.ie,
robdclark@gmail.com, sean@poorly.run, pdhaval@codeaurora.org,
abhinavk@codeaurora.org, jsanka@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] drm/drm_vblank: set the dma-fence timestamp during send_vblank_event
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:26:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a21bad2bd7b5583692535ea107d38872@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201113204525.GV401619@phenom.ffwll.local>
On 2020-11-13 12:45, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:27:23AM -0800, Veera Sundaram Sankaran
> wrote:
>> The explicit out-fences in crtc are signaled as part of vblank event,
>> indicating all framebuffers present on the Atomic Commit request are
>> scanned out on the screen. Though the fence signal and the vblank
>> event
>> notification happens at the same time, triggered by the same hardware
>> vsync event, the timestamp set in both are different. With drivers
>> supporting precise vblank timestamp the difference between the two
>> timestamps would be even higher. This might have an impact on use-mode
>> frameworks using these fence timestamps for purposes other than simple
>> buffer usage. For instance, the Android framework uses the
>> retire-fences
>> as an alternative to vblank when frame-updates are in progress Set the
>> fence timestamp during send vblank event to avoid discrepancies.
>
> I think a reference to the exact source code in android that does this
> would be really useful. Something in drm_hwcomposer or whatever is
> doing
> this.
>
Thanks for the review. Sorry for not getting back earlier, was waiting
for the review on [patch 1/2], so that both comments can be addressed
together.
Here is the reference for Android expecting retire-fence timestamp to
match exactly with hardware vsync as it is used for the dispsync model.
Usage: https://source.android.com/devices/graphics/implement-vsync
Code:
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/native/+/master/services/surfaceflinger/Scheduler/Scheduler.cpp#397
Will update the commit-text with the links as part of V2 patch.
Thanks,
Veera
> Aside from documenting why we want to do this I think this all looks
> reasonable.
> -Daniel
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Veera Sundaram Sankaran <veeras@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
>> index b18e1ef..b38e50c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>> * OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
>> */
>>
>> +#include <linux/dma-fence.h>
>> #include <linux/export.h>
>> #include <linux/kthread.h>
>> #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>> @@ -999,6 +1000,14 @@ static void send_vblank_event(struct drm_device
>> *dev,
>> e->event.seq.time_ns = ktime_to_ns(now);
>> break;
>> }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * update fence timestamp with the same vblank timestamp as both
>> + * are signaled by the same event
>> + */
>> + if (e->base.fence)
>> + e->base.fence->timestamp = now;
>> +
>> trace_drm_vblank_event_delivered(e->base.file_priv, e->pipe, seq);
>> drm_send_event_locked(dev, &e->base);
>> }
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-19 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-12 18:27 [PATCH RESEND 1/2] dma-fence: allow signaling drivers to set fence timestamp Veera Sundaram Sankaran
2020-11-12 18:27 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/2] drm/drm_vblank: set the dma-fence timestamp during send_vblank_event Veera Sundaram Sankaran
2020-11-13 20:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-19 1:26 ` veeras [this message]
2020-11-19 11:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-18 20:27 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/2] dma-fence: allow signaling drivers to set fence timestamp veeras
2020-11-18 20:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-19 11:58 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-03 1:14 ` veeras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a21bad2bd7b5583692535ea107d38872@codeaurora.org \
--to=veeras@codeaurora.org \
--cc=abhinavk@codeaurora.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=jsanka@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pdhaval@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).