From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EB5E1A9B4A; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 09:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749462087; cv=none; b=dq6zWppn4UqXMsf80Egs0z7FpFCKVPu/uk9LKHO7fuog2Bb3CQyyR62u6vEeg7b1IqEqNSImuRSj7Fd6ZxVWP2ujxgtggquqjQRJ1Y6itNEGuykrWCSPkkbT3D6ZwA7LlvFOvm2GYqpyTW+Sf8JCkCyTBWg7gCB8obHquj5jazE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749462087; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6SLWXDnw707oaOJphaYCLslzKGhWC0qAKWIr8Bfsf/I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BhZfzgHs2fSlbCcelU912ApKjviSAs5mCdzFzRTukiY0sJAErR6NV6Ekih7ku8IdOxYk1XNtHhlDjbNqGJbySyiJPmv7BYyDVMtxoKnSLrFBlSNq2C62M99STOV8sC9yXmbbwvy5oViiYQpMh0/651sfSTaHx0h4X5u7cLglsek= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=jJhBM6fW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="jJhBM6fW" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1749462086; x=1780998086; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=6SLWXDnw707oaOJphaYCLslzKGhWC0qAKWIr8Bfsf/I=; b=jJhBM6fW6PWNcwfTB2Rs9g+rXo6geDtkgRKqziYX7DTMNM+MwQgjLVEI j0OPkMrv+gjAdwXzrR0XGfSUWHuS/n6dj6dJ+a4QzPMs7YMyiBNAOketu LX50H6960+2Ac1wgzIOlUS/fPxNhShhBZMHKEsKRmDxnxUS/cMuNnZPcv VecHXXNxRLK0X3WZRYXFoRmrXOvdlMG5npl92Qt0JjfaOE4j2VIDuFGW5 o8rxpxj5sOspB4I4yVN7fkihCXIMB8ELaSJiWG2SQAthkbkdGO+5qATTB s1Omvgh3el01N1BTnI+gkPPoqQoDXWcQxltr5Iey4dmKyCh+ZWaf1T/bs w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: eJblwmVeSIus98v2N5iiaQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RZY1HP04QmSQ2Sx8snFGKA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11458"; a="51676927" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,222,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="51676927" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jun 2025 02:41:25 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: G3Ux45i/RkuTHIr0aHItCA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: FtW2IOJFSdeO6fpPoFEHhg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,222,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="177400448" Received: from sschumil-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO kekkonen.fi.intel.com) ([10.245.244.36]) by orviesa002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jun 2025 02:41:23 -0700 Received: from kekkonen.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kekkonen.fi.intel.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D4CA11FC22; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 12:41:21 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 09:41:21 +0000 Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo From: Sakari Ailus To: Niklas =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F6derlund?= Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Tomi Valkeinen , Laurent Pinchart , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] media: rcar-vin: Use correct count of remote subdevices Message-ID: References: <20250606182606.3984508-1-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> <20250606182606.3984508-2-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 09:39:40AM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > * Changes since v4 > > - Use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of updating the incorrect define to > > RVIN_REMOTES_MAX. > > Do you still need RVIN_REMOTES_MAX()? Couldn't you use ARRAY_SIZE() > elsewhere, too? I checked rcar-vin.h, please ignore the above comment. -- Sakari Ailus