From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Christian Meissl <meissl.christian@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM/dma-mapping: invalidate caches on arch_dma_prep_coherent
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 14:17:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFFq19W0D5JeOyeI@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43a834c8f871f8719368b3f3239f27ee4f6c6286.camel@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 09:54:46AM +0200, Christian Meissl wrote:
> since switching to dma-direct, memory using DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING
> is no longer allocated using the arch specific handlers and instead
> will use dma_direct_alloc_no_mapping. While the arm specific allocation
> handlers implicitly clear the allocated dma buffers and will flush any caches
> dma-direct relies on ARCH_HAS_DMA_PREP_COHERENT to flush the caches.
>
> Without this flush video frame corruption can occur in drivers
> like the coda v4l2 driver which explicitly sets the DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING flag.
>
> Fixes: ae626eb97376 ("ARM/dma-mapping: use dma-direct unconditionally")
> Signed-off-by: Christian Meissl <meissl.christian@gmail.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 88c2d68a69c9..bde7ae4ba31a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -1821,3 +1821,11 @@ void arch_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
> {
> __arm_dma_free(dev, size, cpu_addr, dma_handle, attrs, false);
> }
> +
> +void arch_dma_prep_coherent(struct page *page, size_t size)
> +{
> + void *ptr = page_address(page);
> +
> + dmac_flush_range(ptr, ptr + size);
> + outer_flush_range(__pa(ptr), __pa(ptr) + size);
> +}
It probably doesn't make any difference in practice, FWIW arm64 only
does a clean rather than flush (clean+invalidate) here.
What I noticed is that arch_dma_prep_coherent() is only called for
lowmem pages, so doing page_address() is safe. However, I don't think we
have anything to flush the caches for highmem pages.
--
Catalin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-17 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-17 7:54 [PATCH] ARM/dma-mapping: invalidate caches on arch_dma_prep_coherent Christian Meissl
2025-06-17 13:17 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFFq19W0D5JeOyeI@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=meissl.christian@gmail.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox