* [PATCH] media: rzg2l-cru: Replace usleep_range with udelay
@ 2025-12-02 16:08 Tommaso Merciai
2025-12-03 2:35 ` Laurent Pinchart
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tommaso Merciai @ 2025-12-02 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tomm.merciai
Cc: linux-renesas-soc, biju.das.jz, Tommaso Merciai,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Laurent Pinchart, Hans Verkuil,
Lad Prabhakar, Daniel Scally, Jacopo Mondi, linux-media,
linux-kernel, Khai Nguyen, Hao Bui
`usleep_range()` should not be used in atomic contexts like between
spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_lock_irqrestore() pair inside function
rzg2l_cru_stop_image_processing(). That may cause scheduling while
atomic bug.
Signed-off-by: Khai Nguyen <khai.nguyen.wx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao Bui <hao.bui.yg@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai.xr@bp.renesas.com>
---
drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c
index 162e2ace6931..1355bfd186d4 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ void rzg2l_cru_stop_image_processing(struct rzg2l_cru_dev *cru)
if (cru->info->fifo_empty(cru))
break;
- usleep_range(10, 20);
+ udelay(10);
}
/* Notify that FIFO is not empty here */
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ void rzg2l_cru_stop_image_processing(struct rzg2l_cru_dev *cru)
AMnAXISTPACK_AXI_STOP_ACK)
break;
- usleep_range(10, 20);
+ udelay(10);
}
/* Notify that AXI bus can not stop here */
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] media: rzg2l-cru: Replace usleep_range with udelay
2025-12-02 16:08 [PATCH] media: rzg2l-cru: Replace usleep_range with udelay Tommaso Merciai
@ 2025-12-03 2:35 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-12-03 8:45 ` Tommaso Merciai
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2025-12-03 2:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tommaso Merciai
Cc: tomm.merciai, linux-renesas-soc, biju.das.jz,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Hans Verkuil, Lad Prabhakar, Daniel Scally,
Jacopo Mondi, linux-media, linux-kernel, Khai Nguyen, Hao Bui
Hi Tommaso,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 05:08:41PM +0100, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> `usleep_range()` should not be used in atomic contexts like between
> spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_lock_irqrestore() pair inside function
> rzg2l_cru_stop_image_processing(). That may cause scheduling while
> atomic bug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Khai Nguyen <khai.nguyen.wx@renesas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Bui <hao.bui.yg@renesas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai.xr@bp.renesas.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c
> index 162e2ace6931..1355bfd186d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c
> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ void rzg2l_cru_stop_image_processing(struct rzg2l_cru_dev *cru)
> if (cru->info->fifo_empty(cru))
> break;
>
> - usleep_range(10, 20);
> + udelay(10);
There's an instance of msleep() earlier in this function, surrounded by
spin_unlock_irqrestore() and spin_lock_irqsave(). I wondered if we
should do the same here, but that lead to a second question: why does
the driver need to cover the whole stop procedure with a spinlock in the
first place ?
> }
>
> /* Notify that FIFO is not empty here */
> @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ void rzg2l_cru_stop_image_processing(struct rzg2l_cru_dev *cru)
> AMnAXISTPACK_AXI_STOP_ACK)
> break;
>
> - usleep_range(10, 20);
> + udelay(10);
> }
>
> /* Notify that AXI bus can not stop here */
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] media: rzg2l-cru: Replace usleep_range with udelay
2025-12-03 2:35 ` Laurent Pinchart
@ 2025-12-03 8:45 ` Tommaso Merciai
2025-12-03 10:55 ` David Laight
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tommaso Merciai @ 2025-12-03 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laurent Pinchart
Cc: tomm.merciai, linux-renesas-soc, biju.das.jz,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Hans Verkuil, Lad Prabhakar, Daniel Scally,
Jacopo Mondi, linux-media, linux-kernel, Khai Nguyen, Hao Bui
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for your review.
On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 11:35:52AM +0900, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tommaso,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 05:08:41PM +0100, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > `usleep_range()` should not be used in atomic contexts like between
> > spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_lock_irqrestore() pair inside function
> > rzg2l_cru_stop_image_processing(). That may cause scheduling while
> > atomic bug.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Khai Nguyen <khai.nguyen.wx@renesas.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hao Bui <hao.bui.yg@renesas.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai.xr@bp.renesas.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c
> > index 162e2ace6931..1355bfd186d4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c
> > @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ void rzg2l_cru_stop_image_processing(struct rzg2l_cru_dev *cru)
> > if (cru->info->fifo_empty(cru))
> > break;
> >
> > - usleep_range(10, 20);
> > + udelay(10);
>
> There's an instance of msleep() earlier in this function, surrounded by
> spin_unlock_irqrestore() and spin_lock_irqsave(). I wondered if we
> should do the same here, but that lead to a second question: why does
> the driver need to cover the whole stop procedure with a spinlock in the
> first place ?
Good point :)
Mmm maybe the only critical section into the
rzg2l_cru_stop_image_processing() that needs
spin_unlock_irqrestore()/spin_lock_irqsave()
is:
spin_lock_irqsave(&cru->qlock, flags);
cru->state = RZG2L_CRU_DMA_STOPPED;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cru->qlock, flags);
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Kind Regards,
Tommaso
>
> > }
> >
> > /* Notify that FIFO is not empty here */
> > @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ void rzg2l_cru_stop_image_processing(struct rzg2l_cru_dev *cru)
> > AMnAXISTPACK_AXI_STOP_ACK)
> > break;
> >
> > - usleep_range(10, 20);
> > + udelay(10);
> > }
> >
> > /* Notify that AXI bus can not stop here */
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] media: rzg2l-cru: Replace usleep_range with udelay
2025-12-03 8:45 ` Tommaso Merciai
@ 2025-12-03 10:55 ` David Laight
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Laight @ 2025-12-03 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tommaso Merciai
Cc: Laurent Pinchart, tomm.merciai, linux-renesas-soc, biju.das.jz,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Hans Verkuil, Lad Prabhakar, Daniel Scally,
Jacopo Mondi, linux-media, linux-kernel, Khai Nguyen, Hao Bui
On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:45:43 +0100
Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai.xr@bp.renesas.com> wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 11:35:52AM +0900, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Tommaso,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 05:08:41PM +0100, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > > `usleep_range()` should not be used in atomic contexts like between
> > > spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_lock_irqrestore() pair inside function
> > > rzg2l_cru_stop_image_processing(). That may cause scheduling while
> > > atomic bug.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Khai Nguyen <khai.nguyen.wx@renesas.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Hao Bui <hao.bui.yg@renesas.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai.xr@bp.renesas.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c
> > > index 162e2ace6931..1355bfd186d4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-video.c
> > > @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ void rzg2l_cru_stop_image_processing(struct rzg2l_cru_dev *cru)
> > > if (cru->info->fifo_empty(cru))
> > > break;
> > >
> > > - usleep_range(10, 20);
> > > + udelay(10);
> >
> > There's an instance of msleep() earlier in this function, surrounded by
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore() and spin_lock_irqsave(). I wondered if we
> > should do the same here, but that lead to a second question: why does
> > the driver need to cover the whole stop procedure with a spinlock in the
> > first place ?
>
> Good point :)
> Mmm maybe the only critical section into the
> rzg2l_cru_stop_image_processing() that needs
> spin_unlock_irqrestore()/spin_lock_irqsave()
> is:
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&cru->qlock, flags);
> cru->state = RZG2L_CRU_DMA_STOPPED;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cru->qlock, flags);
That doesn't look right.
You pretty much never need a lock for a single assignment.
The most you need is a WRITE_ONCE() - and they are pretty unlikely
to matter at all.
David
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Tommaso
>
> >
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* Notify that FIFO is not empty here */
> > > @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ void rzg2l_cru_stop_image_processing(struct rzg2l_cru_dev *cru)
> > > AMnAXISTPACK_AXI_STOP_ACK)
> > > break;
> > >
> > > - usleep_range(10, 20);
> > > + udelay(10);
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* Notify that AXI bus can not stop here */
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Laurent Pinchart
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-12-03 10:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-12-02 16:08 [PATCH] media: rzg2l-cru: Replace usleep_range with udelay Tommaso Merciai
2025-12-03 2:35 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-12-03 8:45 ` Tommaso Merciai
2025-12-03 10:55 ` David Laight
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox