From: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Cc: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@gmail.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] media: qcom: camss: support for empty endpoint nodes
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 21:20:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aVSIYAC3DTD3dneW@rdacayan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b1b0259-90d4-4e7c-8bc5-01e22c371e24@linaro.org>
On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 09:40:14AM +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 30/12/2025 02:27, Richard Acayan wrote:
> > This series adds support for empty endpoint nodes. It is currently RFC
> > because it continues an ongoing discussion on how to selectively connect
> > some CAMSS ports to cameras and leave others disconnected.
> >
> > The SDM670 patches are for a full example. If agreed on, this should
> > expand to SoCs that have CAMSS.
(snip)
>
> I don't think I am 100% understanding what the intent of this series is,
> i.e. at a high level the problem you're aiming to solve.
>
> Can you elaborate a bit ?
The point is to move the graph nodes entirely to the SoC devicetree so
the board doesn't have to redefine it. There is an explanation in patch 2,
but the next revision can try to cut some of the rambling and also
briefly explain in this cover.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-31 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-30 2:27 [RFC PATCH 0/3] media: qcom: camss: support for empty endpoint nodes Richard Acayan
2025-12-30 2:27 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: media: camss: sdm670: Make endpoint properties optional Richard Acayan
2025-12-30 7:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-12-30 2:27 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] media: qcom: camss: allow endpoints with no remote Richard Acayan
2025-12-30 2:27 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm670: remove status properties of camss endpoints Richard Acayan
2025-12-30 8:18 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] media: qcom: camss: support for empty endpoint nodes Vladimir Zapolskiy
2025-12-31 3:02 ` Richard Acayan
2025-12-31 8:34 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2026-01-30 11:31 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-12-30 9:40 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-12-31 2:20 ` Richard Acayan [this message]
2025-12-31 3:08 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-01-10 1:03 ` Richard Acayan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aVSIYAC3DTD3dneW@rdacayan \
--to=mailingradian@gmail.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=todor.too@gmail.com \
--cc=vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox