From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C6FC37F119; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770651847; cv=none; b=BpsvJeKouW9SCsgD5cBBImnzZLyIOneZ5F448OMF5krc6k5j0T5xTU+XyVOGWn8/k/8imxGAcpo5kwhj2IvVSSjPQ1oaYpKOiN+cBDmCnMbsCWJLVbDNiIXTn9C09mNxbEveue4f/WkzEAl72BNPa3yneFSWu/BdRgXe+GqOkiQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770651847; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OYUuRf5bsJv/v+H06ZtJEDxn4NzbZm6q5ByduQSKWDg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LTQcEdGjZmwLwKFLiaxnvFuTRE+jr8RdBKGuFiJtQhRZNcPSgwpnq++x3B5ymLmELA/JC8ZQPUNLL+wJ1pjVJAVynP9lCoyBRmdceDHFRLbZ43O6tO6Ui0EfmOwdkpiFpdZspz8gfLunzWiyazrgE3Ch7i5xLpHCQAWIgcEtCqA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=b3deW3ZI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="b3deW3ZI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770651847; x=1802187847; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=OYUuRf5bsJv/v+H06ZtJEDxn4NzbZm6q5ByduQSKWDg=; b=b3deW3ZINnwaZrFmcj3RyDhtWtQIk021oXoAnsKiP8VKy6QCDqC5dj8I kLpK6eVGMLPjkMmvNU5JVCzLVQIUakrxVHMkxaJS85MIvzmUmOMyXNQSI P5QNbEisF5pCm9OXeIb9xlgDGFBJQg9TNhrgY00/4ogJ0joVKeISQLZB3 n1hSyudn+ZrTx2CEGfadUpzhrhrCFW5fzB8E7gnkASJwYD+ha6ZrweW0R dhq74qw4VajHECE4pM44lkWwGDnIgIM3d1LYgTsVdQBIo2gB8W/fzim6/ /TEWCQJktfiwYbPcH2DpC1P8W9ZzpN0gSOm4KebpAS4vrjeHomthfx1Jx A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ljo9sIHXQ1qZbF4cwYdOLQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: FL+AHFTCSMe+ammKOYL+5Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11696"; a="71664355" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,282,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="71664355" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2026 07:44:07 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: rFDQ90I3Qx+cRnerUmTueg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Z/Knezb5TFm+l50Em3YZqA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,282,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="210780087" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.128]) by fmviesa006-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2026 07:44:04 -0800 Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 17:44:02 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Matt Wardle Cc: Hans de Goede , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Andy Shevchenko , Sakari Ailus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] staging: media: atomisp: Fix missing braces for statement blocks Message-ID: References: <20260209142820.650334-1-matt@mattwardle.net> <20260209142820.650334-4-matt@mattwardle.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260209142820.650334-4-matt@mattwardle.net> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 02:29:28PM +0000, Matt Wardle wrote: > Fix checkpatch.pl checks: > > CHECK: Unbalanced braces around else statement > CHECK: braces {} should be used on all arms of this statement > CHECK: Blank lines aren't necessary before a close brace '}' OK, but I think this one can wait. This most likely doesn't affect readability in any better way (so, w/o this patch it's not worse than after). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko