From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Tomasz Unger <tomasz.unger@yahoo.pl>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] media: staging: atomisp: Remove unnecessary return statements from void functions
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 13:12:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abE_9phG4OhjBLKS@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260311-atomisp-remove-void-return-v2b-v4-1-62275c55e353@yahoo.pl>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 10:48:07AM +0100, Tomasz Unger wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/hive_isp_css_common/host/input_formatter.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/hive_isp_css_common/host/input_formatter.c
> index 40b3f1e48c56..db4052ab3665 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/hive_isp_css_common/host/input_formatter.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/hive_isp_css_common/host/input_formatter.c
> @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
>
> #include "system_global.h"
>
> -
I was debating whether I should ignore this... When you delete a return
and a blank line those have to be done as one step otherwise you're
introducing new checkpatch warnings. But this blank line is an
unrelated change. The patch does it a couple other places as well.
> #include "input_formatter.h"
> #include <type_support.h>
> #include "gp_device.h"
> @@ -65,8 +64,6 @@ void input_formatter_rst(
> if (!HIVE_IF_BIN_COPY[ID]) {
> input_formatter_reg_store(ID, addr, rst);
> }
> -
> - return;
> }
>
[ snip ]
> @@ -483,7 +482,6 @@ void hmm_bo_release(struct hmm_buffer_object *bo)
> __bo_insert_to_free_rbtree(&bdev->free_rbtree, bo);
>
> mutex_unlock(&bdev->rbtree_mutex);
> - return;
> }
>
> void hmm_bo_device_exit(struct hmm_bo_device *bdev)
> @@ -737,8 +735,6 @@ void hmm_bo_free_pages(struct hmm_buffer_object *bo)
> kfree(bo->pages);
> mutex_unlock(&bo->mutex);
>
> - return;
> -
Deleting this return introduces a bug.
> status_err2:
> mutex_unlock(&bo->mutex);
> dev_err(atomisp_dev,
> @@ -868,8 +864,6 @@ void hmm_bo_unbind(struct hmm_buffer_object *bo)
>
> mutex_unlock(&bo->mutex);
>
> - return;
> -
Bug.
> status_err:
> mutex_unlock(&bo->mutex);
> dev_err(atomisp_dev,
regards,
dan carpenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260311-atomisp-remove-void-return-v2b-v4-1-62275c55e353.ref@yahoo.pl>
2026-03-11 9:48 ` [PATCH v4] media: staging: atomisp: Remove unnecessary return statements from void functions Tomasz Unger
2026-03-11 10:12 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abE_9phG4OhjBLKS@stanley.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tomasz.unger@yahoo.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox