From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A551C84A0 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.150 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773966930; cv=none; b=K4meFz783BIQ2gXgicd8pdHJv3OUPTMcqlOpkQStL9pvL0q0IVgz7d1C6WkeuuWVB9KMsb0mdlRvhA15JKhSMBFC5XOHuvhQfKUkRS1eq/rV3OSSgfj8Swf2ZMockl/xn5RTbjD8DQFhO8ILS2kXjb4eBIYRaz7ONdvBG4lLFWY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773966930; c=relaxed/simple; bh=j7QjpZQhiVE57gCK0RTyHucoH872U8FmVMG0ksAnbk4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AyomRsYYHFqmZoFl8YvHOms3IDZgJkP1i9rNc1aNQRidsYHDyAoiHbXm28WYlhFDisUzY4tV+LplLBU113Fa2Nv1Lnn3zEzczV/+dTAEdcAbkCM+sXajijRGEwSsfO2BXceNlAyYB5WvhCe2G8BfOnV9f1pvrO1DZt0/T3ie6BY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=invisiblethingslab.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=invisiblethingslab.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=invisiblethingslab.com header.i=@invisiblethingslab.com header.b=o9iRXE22; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=aHcOmJ7z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.150 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=invisiblethingslab.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=invisiblethingslab.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=invisiblethingslab.com header.i=@invisiblethingslab.com header.b="o9iRXE22"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="aHcOmJ7z" Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3405DEC01DD; Thu, 19 Mar 2026 20:35:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-03 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 19 Mar 2026 20:35:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= invisiblethingslab.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1773966927; x=1774053327; bh=JcONGwatR7I2a2nbnBcn4nDdjiD848qctkczcd/135I=; b= o9iRXE22s4v3SibxaC9hpc6A6uyuS+CaFY0enqTN+htegyVqj9n4jY5e5KjzSG/5 G8AKSWMNKCAY2RX93lNRZl+5LG571pYpQVGaJpFkAu3ySjaw0bz/DuyeMqW25II5 +JnoI+tVg1jrLTQsvPaejhxeMcfOzZ1bU7Ei6PSyUBv7zWHaxDEK3MBadIjBCaYc YmIhF8FFm7OqTwiGsZtKQiwekGCxX+Z+BkSC10ATaHxLlHVKz9BNevbCGHWld8cI yM9hx1+U0Nxpg9Z92ADffOiOWsl5EVyYODmLjpIAAxht/kFB8afE+QUHCIBAnOe5 SqCQy42dAKMPD5dPXJSzPg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1773966927; x=1774053327; bh=JcONGwatR7I2a2nbnBcn4nDdjiD848qctkc zcd/135I=; b=aHcOmJ7z78hfcHqG88kU0UoJ7OiJ9gSWCciMgCIW9Oe1aj12F/w sz4BhUijpJi+6Mg9B1QwFNMMzEKP2cVL2kbQj5Pq4tKtN8FM1Cu5v92XtOTg3JNa tWKrdTWaNuqBOz+SCl1u3UUQKUAPUfD35ZL/39vqFJgWyW/heuXiy6TRPAVqP6K8 x7W66zvshvDLNJS4acOdSpgnBFzYrf4jBv+j2BT1gRRA+eMZDs3+KDYrdw87hG9V OjUbXXwg/rVUvx53/ZYdfeKBPoK3CkRKbuOjTgqAubXzd9dO/18dquC0xtHXn02k 7rxxDr234hGp/90mGkDCgWrmwRLgsZAcvfg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgdeftdekgeeiucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtjeenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhgvkhcu ofgrrhgtiiihkhhofihskhhiqdfikphrvggtkhhiuceomhgrrhhmrghrvghksehinhhvih hsihgslhgvthhhihhnghhslhgrsgdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgfduleet feevhfefheeiteeliefhjefhleduveetteekveettddvgeeuteefjedunecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhgrrhhmrghrvghksehi nhhvihhsihgslhgvthhhihhnghhslhgrsgdrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohephedpmh houggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtoheprhhisggrlhgurgestghhrhhomhhiuhhm rdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheplhgruhhrvghnthdrphhinhgthhgrrhhtsehiuggvrghsoh hnsghorghrugdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehhrghnshhgsehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdp rhgtphhtthhopehlihhnuhigqdhmvgguihgrsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpd hrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqmhhmsehkvhgrtghkrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i1568416f:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 19 Mar 2026 20:35:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 01:35:24 +0100 From: Marek =?utf-8?Q?Marczykowski-G=C3=B3recki?= To: Ricardo Ribalda Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Hans de Goede , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: Linux 7.0-rc4: v4l2src0:src: page allocation failure - increased memory usage in 7.0? Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3Wmh7zzAptM1+3iD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --3Wmh7zzAptM1+3iD Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 01:35:24 +0100 From: Marek =?utf-8?Q?Marczykowski-G=C3=B3recki?= To: Ricardo Ribalda Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Hans de Goede , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: Linux 7.0-rc4: v4l2src0:src: page allocation failure - increased memory usage in 7.0? On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 11:19:38AM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote: > On Thu, 19 Mar 2026 at 01:18, Marek Marczykowski-G=C3=B3recki > > Additionally, this failure isn't handled gracefully, it's followed with: >=20 > That should not happen.... Could you check if this fixes it: Yes, while the page allocation failure still happens, it doesn't result in follow up errors anymore. --=20 Best Regards, Marek Marczykowski-G=C3=B3recki Invisible Things Lab --3Wmh7zzAptM1+3iD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhrpukzGPukRmQqkK24/THMrX1ywFAmm8lkwACgkQ24/THMrX 1yzZqgf6A1X1/vuRf+H4NNzBAsVYrRbNQzGgQKlEkx/IG/lvr3pV3QaNCxsgpHyi rMbm1sd7/PSW5kmL4TcqeozhJcH+RSE26nGL2PfTsGu9vG+u1C3J3x4EszM86Via 7P8rj9uc4bESWCDsIvPevH5o6f7YRN2idp4YpOfm2e5iVMDFclSN/N3PAT/TZEmM Jir4SEiuu1C1tXlrsB5FTzipvS2oJUpOTD+A0f6PEhqzKVaCbnFYvSz38IVmk1Kz voPL8FtD1fopAWdFIuDCF1Y+oJLSPbz4AAxVt818xMmcIzXi35NgdGX8th+9Tv0G 9gBAr80v3xSVPv7peCA742lU1bUsww== =uE5Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3Wmh7zzAptM1+3iD--