From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: "Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga" <azpijr@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: media: atomisp: refactor ia_css_stream_destroy
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 10:55:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acTmYxTHu9X4gqOY@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260325230453.848584-1-azpijr@gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 12:04:48AM +0100, Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga wrote:
> Refactor the ISP2401 cleanup logic into a separate helper
> function.
>
> Fix a logic bug where the loop variable 'i' was being shadowed and
> overwritten by a nested loop, potentially causing incorrect cleanup
> behavior.
This should be done separately and have a Fixes tag.
>
> Replace an early 'return -EINVAL' with 'continue' within the cleanup
> loop. In a destruction path, it is better to proceed with cleaning up as
> many resources as possible rather than aborting early, which would
> result in memory leaks for the remaining pipes.
>
> Remove 'assert(entry)' in favor of an explicit null pointer check ('if
> (!entry) continue;'). This avoids a macro-based assertions and ensuring
> the system remains stable even if a pointer is unexpectedly null during
> cleanup.
The assert in atomisp is a wrapper around BUG(). Add that to the commit
message.
You're going to have to redo this anyway because the i vs j fix needs
to be done separately as the first patch and it needs to have a Fixes
tag. I would kind of prefer if you did this as three patches:
patch 1: fix i vs j bug
patch 2: pull it into a separate function
patch 3: improve the function
It's easier for me to review that way.
regards,
dan carpenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-25 23:04 [PATCH] staging: media: atomisp: refactor ia_css_stream_destroy Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-03-26 7:55 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acTmYxTHu9X4gqOY@stanley.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=azpijr@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox