Linux Media Controller development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Cc: "Alex Williamson" <alex@shazbot.org>,
	"Leon Romanovsky" <leon@kernel.org>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	"Alex Mastro" <amastro@fb.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>,
	"Mahmoud Adam" <mngyadam@amazon.de>,
	"David Matlack" <dmatlack@google.com>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Kevin Tian" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"Ankit Agrawal" <ankita@nvidia.com>,
	"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	"Vivek Kasireddy" <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] vfio/pci: Add a helper to look up PFNs for DMABUFs
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 20:30:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aisa6H-a-176MXhC@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610154327.37758-3-matt@ozlabs.org>

On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 04:43:16PM +0100, Matt Evans wrote:
> Add vfio_pci_dma_buf_find_pfn(), which a VMA fault handler can use to
> find a PFN.
> 
> This supports multi-range DMABUFs, which typically would be used to
> represent scattered spans but might even represent overlapping or
> aliasing spans of PFNs.
> 
> Because this is intended to be used in vfio_pci_core.c, we also need
> to expose the struct vfio_pci_dma_buf in the vfio_pci_priv.h header.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_priv.h   |  20 +++++
>  2 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c
> index c16f460c01d6..9e5e865f6fb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c
> @@ -9,19 +9,6 @@
>  
>  MODULE_IMPORT_NS("DMA_BUF");
>  
> -struct vfio_pci_dma_buf {
> -	struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
> -	struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev;
> -	struct list_head dmabufs_elm;
> -	size_t size;
> -	struct phys_vec *phys_vec;
> -	struct p2pdma_provider *provider;
> -	u32 nr_ranges;
> -	struct kref kref;
> -	struct completion comp;
> -	u8 revoked : 1;
> -};
> -
>  static int vfio_pci_dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
>  				   struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment)
>  {
> @@ -106,6 +93,130 @@ static const struct dma_buf_ops vfio_pci_dmabuf_ops = {
>  	.release = vfio_pci_dma_buf_release,
>  };
>  
> +int vfio_pci_dma_buf_find_pfn(struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv,
> +			      struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +			      unsigned long address,

Nit: s/address/fault_addr ?

> +			      unsigned int order,
> +			      unsigned long *out_pfn)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Given a VMA (start, end, pgoffs) and a fault address,
> +	 * search the corresponding DMABUF's phys_vec[] to find the
> +	 * range representing the address's offset into the VMA, and
> +	 * its PFN.
> +	 *
> +	 * The phys_vec[] ranges represent contiguous spans of VAs
> +	 * upwards from the buffer offset 0; the actual PFNs might be
> +	 * in any order, overlap/alias, etc.  Calculate an offset of
> +	 * the desired page given VMA start/pgoff and address, then
> +	 * search upwards from 0 to find which span contains it.
> +	 *
> +	 * On success, a valid PFN for a page sized by 'order' is
> +	 * returned into out_pfn.
> +	 *
> +	 * Failure occurs if:
> +	 * - The page would cross the edge of the VMA
> +	 * - The page isn't entirely contained within a range
> +	 * - We find a range, but the final PFN isn't aligned to the
> +	 *   requested order.
> +	 *
> +	 * (Upon failure, the caller is expected to try again with a
> +	 * smaller order; the tests above will always succeed for
> +	 * order=0 as the limit case.)
> +	 *
> +	 * It's suboptimal if DMABUFs are created with neigbouring
> +	 * ranges that are physically contiguous, since hugepages
> +	 * can't straddle range boundaries.  (The construction of the
> +	 * ranges vector should merge such ranges.)
> +	 *
> +	 * Finally, vma_pgoff_adjust is used for a DMABUF representing
> +	 * a VFIO BAR mmap, which is created from the start of the
> +	 * offset region.
> +	 */
> +
> +	const unsigned long pagesize = PAGE_SIZE << order;
> +	unsigned long vma_off = ((vma->vm_pgoff - priv->vma_pgoff_adjust) <<
> +				 PAGE_SHIFT) & VFIO_PCI_OFFSET_MASK;
> +	unsigned long rounded_page_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(address, pagesize);
> +	unsigned long rounded_page_end = rounded_page_addr + pagesize;
> +	unsigned long page_buf_offset;
> +	unsigned long page_buf_offset_end;
> +	unsigned long range_buf_offset = 0;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	if (rounded_page_addr < vma->vm_start || rounded_page_end > vma->vm_end) {
> +		if (order > 0)
> +			return -EAGAIN;
> +
> +		/* A fault address outside of the VMA is absurd. */
> +		WARN(1, "Fault addr 0x%lx outside VMA 0x%lx-0x%lx\n",
> +		     address, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end);

This could flood dmesg if triggered repeatedly by userspace :( 
Since a fault outside the VMA is an invalid access that already results
in a SIGBUS, we could probably avoid the WARN here?
Perhaps pr_warn_ratelimited() should suffice?

> +		return -EFAULT;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * page_buff_offset[_end] is the span of DMABUF offsets
> +	 * corresponding to the faulting page:
> +	 */
> +	if (unlikely(check_add_overflow(rounded_page_addr - vma->vm_start,
> +					vma_off, &page_buf_offset) ||
> +		     check_add_overflow(page_buf_offset, pagesize,
> +					&page_buf_offset_end)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < priv->nr_ranges; i++) {
> +		size_t range_len = priv->phys_vec[i].len;
> +		phys_addr_t range_start = priv->phys_vec[i].paddr;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * If the current range starts after the page's span,
> +		 * this and any future range won't match.  Bail early.
> +		 */
> +		if (page_buf_offset_end <= range_buf_offset)
> +			break;
> +
> +		if (page_buf_offset >= range_buf_offset &&
> +		    page_buf_offset_end <= range_buf_offset + range_len) {
> +			/*
> +			 * The faulting page is wholly contained
> +			 * within the span represented by the range.
> +			 * Validate PFN alignment for the order:
> +			 */
> +			unsigned long pfn = (range_start + page_buf_offset -
> +					     range_buf_offset) / PAGE_SIZE;

Minor nit: I'm aware that decent compilers convert pow(2) divides to >> 
However, we seem to be using `>> PAGE_SHIFT` across vfio-pci. E.g.:

return (pci_resource_start(vdev->pdev, index) >> PAGE_SHIFT) + pgoff;
unsigned long pgoff = (addr - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;

Let's consider using the same pattern?

> +
> +			if (IS_ALIGNED(pfn, 1 << order)) {
> +				*out_pfn = pfn;
> +				return 0;
> +			}
> +			/* Retry with smaller order */
> +			return -EAGAIN;
> +		}
> +		range_buf_offset += range_len;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * A hugepage straddling a range boundary will fail to match a
> +	 * range, but the address will (eventually) match when retried
> +	 * with a smaller page.
> +	 */
> +	if (order > 0)
> +		return -EAGAIN;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If we get here, the address fell outside of the span
> +	 * represented by the (concatenated) ranges.  Setup of a

Nit: double space before "Setup" and "But" below.

> +	 * mapping must ensure that the VMA is <= the total size of
> +	 * the ranges, so this should never happen.  But, if it does,
> +	 * force SIGBUS for the access and warn.
> +	 */
> +	WARN_ONCE(1, "No range for addr 0x%lx, order %d: VMA 0x%lx-0x%lx pgoff 0x%lx, %u ranges, size 0x%zx\n",
> +		  address, order, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, vma->vm_pgoff,
> +		  priv->nr_ranges, priv->size);
> +
> +	return -EFAULT;

The fall-through logic at the end feels a bit redundant.

If we've exhausted the phys_vec list without finding a match, returning
-EAGAIN for order > 0 seems like the correct fallback behavior.

However, the subsequent WARN_ONCE for the order == 0 seems unnecessary?
An out-of-bounds access is an error that should simply return -EFAULT 
(converting to SIGBUS) without polluting the kernel log with stackdumps?
Can we instead convert this to a pr_warn or something? Something like:

	ret = order ? -EAGAIN : -EFAULT;

	if (ret == -EFAULT)
		pr_warn_ratelimited("No range for addr 0x%lx...\n", address);

	return ret;

(with appropriate comments)

Thanks,
Praan

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-11 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-10 15:43 [PATCH v3 0/9] vfio/pci: Add mmap() for DMABUFs Matt Evans
2026-06-10 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] PCI/P2PDMA: Add CONFIG_PCI_P2PDMA_CORE Matt Evans
2026-06-10 18:39   ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-06-11 16:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-06-11 17:44     ` Matt Evans
2026-06-11 18:37   ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-10 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] vfio/pci: Add a helper to look up PFNs for DMABUFs Matt Evans
2026-06-11 20:30   ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2026-06-10 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] vfio/pci: Add a helper to create a DMABUF for a BAR-map VMA Matt Evans
2026-06-10 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] vfio/pci: Convert BAR mmap() to use a DMABUF Matt Evans
2026-06-10 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] vfio/pci: Provide a user-facing name for BAR mappings Matt Evans
2026-06-10 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] vfio/pci: Clean up BAR zap and revocation Matt Evans
2026-06-10 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] vfio/pci: Support mmap() of a VFIO DMABUF Matt Evans
2026-06-10 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] vfio/pci: Permanently revoke a DMABUF on request Matt Evans
2026-06-10 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] vfio/pci: Add mmap() attributes to DMABUF feature Matt Evans

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aisa6H-a-176MXhC@google.com \
    --to=praan@google.com \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=amastro@fb.com \
    --cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=matt@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mngyadam@amazon.de \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox