From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com>
Cc: "Donald Hunter" <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Vivek Kasireddy" <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
sdf@fomichev.me, razor@blackwall.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
almasrymina@google.com, matttbe@kernel.org, skhawaja@google.com,
dw@davidwei.uk, "Bobby Eshleman" <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] selftests/net: ncdevmem: add -b option to set rx-buf-size on bind
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 14:22:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aislm0fS2MSDMzKf@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611-tcpdm-large-niovs-v2-3-ee2bf15e7523@meta.com>
On 06/11, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
>
> Add -b <bytes> to request a non-default niov size via
> NETDEV_A_DMABUF_RX_BUF_SIZE. When the value exceeds PAGE_SIZE,
> udmabuf_alloc() switches to an MFD_HUGETLB-backed memfd so each 2 MB
> hugepage produces one naturally-aligned sg entry.
>
> Reject values > 2 MB up front: MFD_HUGETLB + udmabuf can only guarantee
> 2 MB per sg entry (one hugepage), so a larger rx_buf_size would fail the
> per-sg length/alignment check.
>
> Add CONFIG_HUGETLBFS=y to drivers/net/hw/config so the new path is
> reachable in the CI kernels built for these tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/config | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/ncdevmem.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/config b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/config
> index cd20024218cd..ed8642b68094 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/config
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/config
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ CONFIG_FAIL_FUNCTION=y
> CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION=y
> CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION_DEBUG_FS=y
> CONFIG_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION=y
> +CONFIG_HUGETLBFS=y
> CONFIG_INET6_ESP=y
> CONFIG_INET6_ESP_OFFLOAD=y
> CONFIG_INET_ESP=y
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/ncdevmem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/ncdevmem.c
> index d96e8a3b5a65..325c128191e2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/ncdevmem.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/ncdevmem.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
> #include <sys/time.h>
>
> #include <linux/memfd.h>
> +#include <sys/param.h>
> #include <linux/dma-buf.h>
> #include <linux/errqueue.h>
> #include <linux/udmabuf.h>
> @@ -79,6 +80,7 @@
> #define PAGE_SHIFT 12
> #define TEST_PREFIX "ncdevmem"
> #define NUM_PAGES 16000
> +#define MB(x) ((x) << 20)
>
> #ifndef MSG_SOCK_DEVMEM
> #define MSG_SOCK_DEVMEM 0x2000000
> @@ -100,6 +102,7 @@ static unsigned int dmabuf_id;
> static uint32_t tx_dmabuf_id;
> static int waittime_ms = 500;
> static bool fail_on_linear;
> +static uint32_t rx_buf_size;
>
> /* System state loaded by current_config_load() */
> #define MAX_FLOWS 8
> @@ -142,6 +145,7 @@ static struct memory_buffer *udmabuf_alloc(size_t size)
> {
> struct udmabuf_create create;
> struct memory_buffer *ctx;
> + unsigned int memfd_flags;
> int ret;
>
> ctx = malloc(sizeof(*ctx));
> @@ -156,9 +160,14 @@ static struct memory_buffer *udmabuf_alloc(size_t size)
> goto err_free_ctx;
> }
>
> - ctx->memfd = memfd_create("udmabuf-test", MFD_ALLOW_SEALING);
> + memfd_flags = MFD_ALLOW_SEALING;
[..]
> + if (rx_buf_size > (uint32_t)getpagesize())
What's the logic behind explicit (uint32_t) cast? uint vs int
comparisons should promote the int to uint automatically?
> + memfd_flags |= MFD_HUGETLB | MFD_HUGE_2MB;
> +
> + ctx->memfd = memfd_create("udmabuf-test", memfd_flags);
> if (ctx->memfd < 0) {
> - pr_err("[skip,no-memfd]");
> + pr_err("[skip,no-memfd%s]",
> + (memfd_flags & MFD_HUGETLB) ? " (need hugepages)" : "");
> goto err_close_dev;
> }
>
> @@ -168,6 +177,11 @@ static struct memory_buffer *udmabuf_alloc(size_t size)
> goto err_close_memfd;
> }
>
> + if (memfd_flags & MFD_HUGETLB) {
> + size = roundup(size, MB(2));
> + ctx->size = size;
> + }
> +
> ret = ftruncate(ctx->memfd, size);
> if (ret == -1) {
> pr_err("[FAIL,memfd-truncate]");
> @@ -699,6 +713,8 @@ static int bind_rx_queue(unsigned int ifindex, unsigned int dmabuf_fd,
> netdev_bind_rx_req_set_ifindex(req, ifindex);
> netdev_bind_rx_req_set_fd(req, dmabuf_fd);
> __netdev_bind_rx_req_set_queues(req, queues, n_queue_index);
> + if (rx_buf_size)
> + netdev_bind_rx_req_set_rx_buf_size(req, rx_buf_size);
>
> rsp = netdev_bind_rx(*ys, req);
> if (!rsp) {
> @@ -1411,7 +1427,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> int is_server = 0, opt;
> int ret, err = 1;
>
> - while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "Lls:c:p:v:q:t:f:z:n")) != -1) {
> + while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "Lls:c:p:v:q:t:f:z:nb:")) != -1) {
> switch (opt) {
> case 'L':
> fail_on_linear = true;
> @@ -1446,6 +1462,33 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> case 'n':
> skip_config = 1;
> break;
> + case 'b': {
> + char *endp;
> + unsigned long val;
Christmas tree here as well?
> +
> + errno = 0;
> + val = strtoul(optarg, &endp, 0);
[..]
> + if (errno || endp == optarg || *endp || val == 0 ||
> + val > UINT32_MAX) {
> + pr_err("invalid rx_buf_size: %s", optarg);
> + return 1;
> + }
This is too sophisticated :-/ Just (if val == UINT32_MAX && errno == ERANGE) ?
(you're looking for an overflow here supposedly?)
[..]
> + if (val & (val - 1)) {
> + pr_err("rx_buf_size must be a power of 2");
> + return 1;
> + }
> + if (val < (unsigned long)getpagesize()) {
> + pr_err("rx_buf_size must be >= PAGE_SIZE (%d)",
> + getpagesize());
> + return 1;
> + }
> + if (val > MB(2)) {
> + pr_err("rx_buf_size > 2 MB not supported");
> + return 1;
> + }
We already check these on the kernel size, so should be ok to drop?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 15:28 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: devmem: allow rx-buf-size > PAGE_SIZE per binding Bobby Eshleman
2026-06-11 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: devmem: allow rx-buf-size > PAGE_SIZE per dmabuf binding Bobby Eshleman
2026-06-11 21:12 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-06-11 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] udmabuf: emit one sg entry per pinned folio Bobby Eshleman
2026-06-11 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] selftests/net: ncdevmem: add -b option to set rx-buf-size on bind Bobby Eshleman
2026-06-11 21:22 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2026-06-11 21:58 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-06-11 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] selftests/net: devmem.py: add check_rx_large_niov Bobby Eshleman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aislm0fS2MSDMzKf@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com \
--to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@gmail.com \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox