From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:42148 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933128AbdCaPpv (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:45:51 -0400 Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:45:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Jonathan Corbet cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Media Mailing List , Linux Doc Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Jani Nikula , Takashi Iwai , Markus Heiser , Silvio Fricke , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Ingo Molnar , Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] genericirq.tmpl: convert it to ReST In-Reply-To: <20170331085711.5ff4a550@lwn.net> Message-ID: References: <20170331085711.5ff4a550@lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 31 Mar 2017, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:11:30 -0300 > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > [Reordering things a bit] > > > +========================== > > +Linux generic IRQ handling > > +========================== > > + > > +:Copyright: |copy| 2005-2010: Thomas Gleixner > > +:Copyright: |copy| 2005-2006: Ingo Molnar > > It seems maybe they should have been CC'd on this one? Adding them now > (and leaving the full patch for their amusement). > > > Brainless conversion of genericirq.tmpl book to ReST, via > > Documentation/sphinx/tmplcvt > > In general this seems good, but I have to wonder how current this material > is at this point? The last substantive change was in 2013 (3.11), and I've > seen a certain amount of IRQ work going by since then. I'm not opposed to > this move at all, but perhaps if it's outdated we should add a note to that > effect? We should take the opportunity and rewrite it proper. I might have an intern available in the next couple of weeks, but I need to check with the folks who are tasked to entertain him :) Thanks, tglx