From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:48089 "EHLO mout.gmx.net"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S933613AbeB1PtI (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-media@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 28 Feb 2018 10:49:08 -0500
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 16:49:03 +0100 (CET)
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: Patch review
In-Reply-To: <1552444.87XHR44T4u@avalon>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802281648440.30133@axis700.grange>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802281559500.29266@axis700.grange> <1552444.87XHR44T4u@avalon>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-media.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Laurent,

Yes, that's correct.

Thanks
Guennadi

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

> Hi Guennadi,
> 
> On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 17:07:00 EET Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I know the "development process and responsibilities" was the main topic
> > during the last media summit. Unfortunately I haven't attended it, from
> > the etherpad notes I also cannot quite conclude what decisions have been
> > made. Have any measures been discussed and agreed upon for cases, when
> > patches don't get reviewed for many months, adding up to more than a year
> > (in this specific case the first version submitted in June 2016)?
> 
> I assume you're talking about the "[PATCH 0/2 v6] uvcvideo: asynchronous 
> controls" series, is that correct ?
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart
>