From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f51.google.com (mail-pj1-f51.google.com [209.85.216.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6895537DEBE for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 21:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784929130; cv=none; b=XrrL3TiDr3Z58b/A6tKJX36sC2WimdC21cdnW3gY7aRESqolGPk/5X7bmGWYVKDbKdvcWyJYqjC2MabF45AIjiNVdZulOMlPNNNd5QH0yWN+aqnqixSZja9PerJZQCQ4j7iGdBxxC8wqPfsPcyKGUILQ3ci3zSlAM1oPEPUhE3g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784929130; c=relaxed/simple; bh=reffKocQBTkitR5sH3HXeyiSkGKFe33s9Gp2+pOr7MI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pH23Bl703sNlCvpbrrLTbHqV2eBafVC3c/YqSvIbGVv4TL9B+F4SOsHmtB6QHQpCL9LBujDhdg1hjfz2mqoH0THvdCMwD5UgYWjzasF64s29BHBUi+u+HSR9lRJ9RdtkIiuDR1pzRa9TrZXURRr+5ZX4aCru9QWZWdYvxU8N8Y4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=cHhlBdyb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="cHhlBdyb" Received: by mail-pj1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3811f512167so851660a91.3 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:38:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1784929129; x=1785533929; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=qq6JMFh0gDJiS/8lUoBGQxGZpE4+LKphNkGVGqdhJ2o=; b=cHhlBdyb8u9uML7p9GdcbuNl0Hd5d7hkhlI0/K6m+CrpbVxEBw4bxEyeJY348ih0s8 SpxjXMTc+UMnFffISf3fxkx5stI3R0DN3rrDyWrqwjRQ/H5+d+6gfs0wXlezI+xSIaIY klGQLjcQcjxAd9DOPHpsxvKlvfUxdNw1tR2ATVyYtD3WCXqz+oSgbRyFZ4/P8Rmx11+B OjxdKDgnGffVEoVrcGkwmGLRI9fng17P74GtgA4vM6Ik1xBIfwHRc//7UITxsxRQ3ns4 /GmSK4897kBMTuCf5/YMaHP94XwfZV22GApERO9ekjoEx4ZYt38zzcofbXAZdczCdzdC GZNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1784929129; x=1785533929; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=qq6JMFh0gDJiS/8lUoBGQxGZpE4+LKphNkGVGqdhJ2o=; b=Hc135oybiclF9VgYq35lMxobvnoLJ2Cbi7NZPCJutDCUh5QNDerT1Q4gSaaNa1jFuG 9rtnnpTvB5ZEI5f1HIm2rGwBQ2XU4qQwEoMQNZPKv2+2qLofDPvN8yrH47D4AoaC3j6U lP0gyacFqIaNmF/Y9JfAWRRByqSjTlcu5L9Kig757qpjOTrWelY2Tm/8NpZO1HJ5hXuA oZtOk4X+nNNM5emRRUjW91CBnk+MtQbpkYolZuX95vUIA0/JPZcquF7HFr1fOOYucQWD l8bxg5yBh9R/W9OU+9G/3CgBVg/lwVlcau02NaV9njL26+9q5Jm29p0u7jbOxdbbmdVI NXYg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+Rrpb+02AZbAck0LnxU0zpOha4azof3vmTE72UV7ccKrYM8yQ+y8o8+xOtEKZ9UhuxfUuPgqcRUwhH3tBQ==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzWMHTzVk/w24AnjBwbzrI35XLhtNUvJT9VRmJEyRvc+W0B1kvv OQRsOZoFS+F1tcC+GRJQTl6y5rATQh3bZ5k8s6xPYxOR+vho+OrrIho7 X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD10/wJDolv0tuZImSWpJVOy6etOTjgjKF4+/D9UBSYU6k9fCe/1WFT864FUWdUG XcwUVCo8Ys9/1nPYaYpQSrQajvGcp/HDPxPTG1+x+fSTG9RzBMHl/WNah4ouNVP/zDzSxKx7y15 g/Q+3j0jsHrFWyHvu/s86xgjjZdjk2hgLsL+ntNhVuw7B4dod/nvX5ptx3IBVx5E/OJW/G4f3KG 0f3oTURx/u7WLWGbrwSNXkejkHW9Y3mCqhmv+FyfsHaII0zQUUU9rSiXBkGh+Pqtoum4tAlGZnJ U73o034fNQYIA7iXXLivDzdoxEqDg8M8SIxRJbHQpZLumIaXv38GSbYYu63ilpxAcyG78ayjzuH lrRRf8Dj6+5GnunqdYaUOyNjDUuiPNIlaRqVOwMIv9LqNPga949R6DAPeR2BE3HtNRCyxmxbqUE 8X0FXBqLhDGpZmtkPrARyb0g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3bce:b0:38e:e0b:320d with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-38f297812c8mr143723a91.41.1784929128727; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from devvm29614.prn0.facebook.com ([2a03:2880:ff:2::]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-38f04175831sm2086519a91.11.2026.07.24.14.38.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:38:45 -0700 From: Bobby Eshleman To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Donald Hunter , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Andrew Lunn , Gerd Hoffmann , Vivek Kasireddy , Sumit Semwal , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Shuah Khan , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, razor@blackwall.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, almasrymina@google.com, matttbe@kernel.org, skhawaja@google.com, dw@davidwei.uk, Joe Damato , Bobby Eshleman Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/3] selftests/net: devmem.py: add check_rx_large_niov Message-ID: References: <20260708-tcpdm-large-niovs-v5-0-34bf6fac941b@meta.com> <20260708-tcpdm-large-niovs-v5-3-34bf6fac941b@meta.com> <20260721110903.34840531@kernel.org> <20260724143001.5afa8631@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260724143001.5afa8631@kernel.org> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 02:30:01PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:04:24 -0700 Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 11:09:03AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Wed, 08 Jul 2026 15:55:06 -0700 Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > > +@ksft_disruptive > > > > +def check_rx_large_niov(cfg) -> None: > > > > + """Run the devmem RX test with rx-buf-size = 16 KiB.""" > > > > + run_rx_large_niov(cfg) > > > > > > Any idea why the devmem tests sprinkle disruptive everywhere? > > > Disruptive means we take the link down, I don't think this test > > > does that. > > > > Talked to Stan and he mentioned the original idea was not necessarily > > just for link down, but any test that could be considered disruptive to > > other tests, with the idea to eventually introduce some scheduling > > (postpone disruptive until the end). > > Perhaps have such conversations on the list? IDK what Stan has in mind. For sure. @Stan, can you elaborate on the intent of @ksft_disruptive? > > > If we can get common agreement on its meaning, maybe I could submit > > something into the documentation and update where its misused? > > > > I'll drop it from this patch since it doesn't bring down the link (and > > seemingly no worries about check_rx_hds() tests not having it).